Helstan Securities Ltd v Hertfordshire County Council
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1978 |
| Date | 1978 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
26 cases
- Australian Olympic Committee Inc. v the Big Fights Inc.
-
Linden Gardens Trust Ltd v Lenesta Sludge Disposals Ltd and Others ; St Martins Property Corporation Ltd and Another v Sir Robert McAlpine Ltd (formerly Sir Robert McAlpine and Sons Ltd)
...contract was largely founded on a Note entitled "Inalienable Rights?" by Professor Goode ( (1979) 42 M.L.R. 553) on Helstan Securities Ltd. v. Hertfordshire County Council [1978] 3 All E.R. 262. In that case a contract contained a clause prohibiting the contractor from assigning the contra......
- Kejuruteraan Bintai Kindenko Sdn Bhd v Malayan Banking Berhad
-
St Martins Property Corporation Ltd and and Another v Sir Robert Mcalpine and Sons Ltd
...the laws of gravitation." 58 That robust sentiment did not appeal to Croom-Johnson J. in Helstan Securities Ltd v. Hertfordshire C.C. [1978] 3 All ER 262. There a contractor for road works had purported to assign to the plaintiffs the amount due for the works from the defendants. It was hel......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
OF PROHIBITIONS ON ASSIGNMENTS, RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS AND NEGATIVE PLEDGES IN COMMERCIAL LAW: CLOGS ON COMMERCE
...JC thought that “the line between an incorporeal property right and a contractual right such as a chose in action must be thin.” 3 [1978] 3 All ER 262. 4 Supra n 3 at 264. 5 [1993] 3 All ER 417; noted by D. Wallace [1994] 110 LQR 42. 6 See Ellis v Torrington[1920] 1 KB 339. 7 (1979) 42 Mod ......
-
BOOK DEBT FINANCING1
...Rights”[1979] M.L.R. 553 at p. 554 and Allcock, “Restrictions On The Assignment of Contractual Rights”[1983] C L J 328 at p 340. 28. [1978] 3 All E R 262. 29. In that case, the assignee had sued the debtor who had paid neither assignee nor assignor. The assignee, on the other hand, had made......