Henry Brothers (Magherafelt) v Ministry of Defence
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1997 |
| Date | 1997 |
| Year | 1997 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
43 cases
-
Yeda Research and Development Company Ltd v Rhone-Poulenc Rorer International Holdings Inc. and Another
...that someone contributed to the claims, because they may include non-patentable integers derived from prior art: see Henry Brothers (Magherafelt) Ltd v Ministry of Defence [1997] RPC 693, 706; [1999] RPC 442. As Laddie J said in the University of Southampton case, the "contribution must b......
-
IDA Ltd and Others v University of Southampton and Others ; University of Southampton's Applications
...views, though he clearly felt sympathy with them and was not sorry to reach a result in accordance with them. 23 In Henry Brothers v MOD [1997] RPC 693 at p.706 I said: "One must seek to identify who in substance made the combination. Who was responsible for the inventive concept, namely t......
- Collag Corporation v Merck & Company Inc.
-
Stephen Thaler v Comptroller General of Patents Trade Marks and Designs
...include non-patentable integers derived from prior art: see Henry Brothers (Magherafelt) Ltd v Ministry of Defence [1997] RPC 693, 706; [1999] RPC 442. As Laddie J said in the University of Southampton case, the “contribution must be to the formulation of the inventive concept”. Deciding up......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Evolutionary Tales: Times of the Best and Worst
...omitted). 43. See, e.g. , 35 U.S.C. §§ 115, 116; 37 C.F.R. § 1.63(a)(4). 44. Henry Bros (Magherafelt) Ltd v Ministry of Defence [1997] RPC 693, 706 (quoted with approval in Gen Transp Equip Pty Ltd v. Tytec Logistics Pty Ltd [2015] APO 91) (Austl.). 45. Merk Co v Sherman [2007] APO 9, ¶ 28 ......
-
Righting Inventorship Wrongs?A Multijurisdictional Overview
...omitted). 43. See, e.g. , 35 U.S.C. §§ 115, 116; 37 C.F.R. § 1.63(a)(4). 44. Henry Bros (Magherafelt) Ltd v Ministry of Defence [1997] RPC 693, 706 (quoted with approval in Gen Transp Equip Pty Ltd v. Tytec Logistics Pty Ltd [2015] APO 91) (Austl.). 45. Merk Co v Sherman [2007] APO 9, ¶ 28 ......
-
Intellectual Property Law
...the formulation of the inventive concept. See also Henry Brothers (Magherafelt) Ltd v Ministry of Defence and Northern Ireland OfficeUNK[1999] RPC 442 at 449. 18.58 In Yeda Research and Development Co Ltd v Rhone-Poulenc Rorer International Holdings IncUNK[2008] RPC 1, Lord Hoffman endorsed......