Henry Vernon port formedon en le remainder envers Thomas Stanley Chevalier
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
English Reports Citation: 123 E.R. 330
DEL COMMON-BANK
Henry Vernon port formedon en le remainder envers Thomas Stanley Chevalier
XXXVII. Henry Vernon port formedon en le remainder envers Thomas Stanley Chevalier et Margaret son feme et John Manners et Borothy sa feme pur Tenements en le County Berb. a que les Tenants appere et plede al issue, et apres ils font default sur que petit cape fuit agard, &c. a quel jour les Barons font default, et les feramea prayont d'eatre receve et le demandant ceo counter plede & dit que les tenants apres default p eux fait, p fine conust les Tenements eatre le droit de un Armstrong come ceo qua le dit Armstrong avoit de lour done & demands jugement si encounter le dit fine ils aer receve a...
To continue reading
Request your trial
134 cases
-
Chief Commissioner of Police (Victoria), Re Application by
...29 CLR 257 at 266–267. 62 (1991) 173 CLR 289 at 303. 63 Mason CJ, Deane, Dawson, Gaudron and McHugh JJ. 64 Supreme Court Act, ss 17( 1) and 18(1)(a). 65 Supreme Court Act, ss 17( 1) and 66 Supreme Court Act, s 17A(1), (2), (3A) and (4)(b). 67 Supreme Court Act, s 17A(4)(a) and (6). 68 Supr......
-
Rural Press Ltd v Accc;Accc v Rural Press Ltd
...the Rural Press parties' appeal failing: ‘1. The appeal be allowed. 2. The orders made by the Full Court of the Federal Court on 16 July 2002 and 18 October 2002 be set aside. 3. The orders made by the Federal Court on 23 March 2001 be set aside, and in lieu thereof substitute the following......
-
Re McBain
...its jurisdiction or that its record discloses an error of law on its face. Such statements represent the law as laid down in the 17th and 18th centuries; they were made in deciding legal issues in a social and legal environment very different from the present. It would undermine the rights ......
-
Jason Arthur Monaghan(Plaintiff) v Australian Capital Territory
...he claimed that the defendant caused the plaintiff to be unlawfully arrested and detained in breach of his rights pursuant to ss 18( 1) and 18(2) of the HR Act. This is particularised as being ‘wrongly arrested and detained in custody by the Australian Federal Police because of a purported ......
Request a trial to view additional results