Henthorn v Fraser

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1892
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
21 cases
  • Lee Seng Heng and Others v Guardian Assurance Company Ltd
    • Malaysia
    • Unspecified court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Knockacummer Wind Farm Ltd v Cremins
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 19 Febrero 2016
    ...to someone. A notice which cannot impinge on anyone's mind is not functioning as such.' He then referred to Henthorn v. Fraser [1892] 2 Ch. 27 where Hershell L.J. stated at p. 33:- 'Where the circumstances are such that it must have been within the contemplation of the parties that, accord......
  • Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust v Sandi Haywood
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 17 Marzo 2017
    ...is posted, I agree with Lewison LJ that that interpretation is inconsistent with the context; nor does the special rule established in Henthorn v Fraser [1892] 2 Ch 27 about acceptance of offers (which may occur at the moment of posting) apply to a notice to terminate. Stephenson v Orca (p......
  • Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Stahl und Stahlwarenhandelgesellschaft m.b.H.
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 21 Enero 1982
    ...and in some cases by a judgment where the risks should lie (see Household Fire Insurance v. Grant u.s. p.227 per Baggallay L.J. and Henthorn v. Fraser [1892] 2 Ch.27 per Lord 9The present case is, as Entores itself, the simple case of instantaneous communication between principals, and, in......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • The Lesotho Electronic Transactions and Electronic Commerce bill : will it replace the common law of contract as we know it?
    • South Africa
    • Sabinet Lesotho Law Journal No. 22-1_2, January 2015
    • 1 Enero 2015
    ...interpraesentes. The very object of their using such instrument is to gain the direct communication that it affords. 68 Henthorn v Fraser [1892] 2 Ch 27, p33. In cape explosives Works Ltd v SA Oil and Far Industries Ltd (1) 1912 CPD 244, p266, Kotze JP put it as follows "[W]here in the ordi......
  • SALE OF GOODS (UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION) ACT 1995
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1996, December 1996
    • 1 Diciembre 1996
    ...differ from common law, which places an obstacle in the form of the doctrine of consideration on irrevocable offers. 13 Henthom v Fraser [1892] 2 Ch 27. 14 Articles 15(1) and 24 — cf. the common law rule that a postal acceptance takes place when the letter is posted (Henthorn v Fraser[1892]......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT