Hepworth v Hepworth
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1865 |
| Year | 1865 |
| Court | Equity |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
- Grimes, deceased. Gore-Grimes and Walsh v Grimes and Rochford
-
Low Gim Siah and Others v Low Geok Khim and Another
...67 (not folld) Bennet v Bennet (1879) 10 Ch D 474 (folld) Harrods Ltd v Tester [1937] 2 All ER 236 (distd) Hepworth v Hepworth (1870-71) LR 11 Eq 10 (refd) McGrath v Wallis [1995] 2 FLR 114 (distd) Murless v Franklin (1818) 1 Swans 13; 36 ER 278 (folld) Neo Tai Kim v Foo Stie Wah [1981-1982......
-
Nicholas Stewart Wood v Kate Rebecca Watkin
...implication of law….’ See too Sidmouth v Sidmouth (1840) 48 ER 1254 at p1258, Scawin v Scawin (1841) 62 ER 792 and Hepworth v Hepworth (1870) LR 11 Eq 10. 93 Whilst, as clear from Lord Neuberger's obiter remarks in Laskar, the presumption may be weaker (and therefore more readily rebuttable......
-
Alan Gregory Smith Bette Nancy Wrenn Norma Laura Joan Hollingworth Faye Jeanette Thompson Robert Lynn Gardiner v Anthony John Smith
...Limited (1979) 143 CLR 134 In re Kerrigan; Ex parte Jones 47 SR (NSW) 76 Referred to: Green v Green (1989) 17 NSWLR 343 Hepworth (1870) LR 11 Eq 10 Nelson v Nelson (1994) 33 NSWLR 740; (1995) 184 CLR 538 The Estate of the Late Smith [2004] NTSC 15 Not Followed: McKie v McKie 23 VLR 489 Musc......
1 books & journal articles
-
Section 199 of the Equality Act 2010: How Not to Abolish the Presumption of Advancement
...vMilligan [1994] 1 AC34 0,but would have done so if theparties in that case had stood in an advancementrelationship.9Hepworth vHepworth (1870) LR 11Eq 10; In re a policy no 6402 of the Scottish EquitableLife AssuranceSociety[19 02] 1 C h 2 82.10 EbrandvDanc er(1680) 2 Chan Cas 80; 22 ER 829......