Herbert v Samuel Fox & Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1915 |
| Date | 1915 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Anglo Newfoundland Development Company Ltd v Pacific Steam Navigation Company Ltd; Owners of the Bogota v Owners of the Alconda
...as set forth in the interlocutor of the Second Division. At the same time, as pointed out by Lord Atkinson, in Herbert v. Samuel Fox, 1916 Appeal Cases 413, we are not bound to take as a finding of fact a finding which is called a finding of fact but which in reality is a finding of law or ......
-
Stephen v Cooper
... ... v. Highley ... In that case a workman in the employment of a railway company crossed the railway lines in order to reach a messroom at which he could get hot water for his ... 17 A similar case in principle was that of ( Herbert v. Fox 1916 1 A.C., 405 ) when the House of Lords decided that the accident was occasioned by the ... This is illustrated by the difference of opinion in the House in the case of Herbert v. Samuel Fox & Co. In the present case the facts seem to me to put it under the second of these two ... ...
-
Gordon v Fife Coal Company
...[1901] 2 K. B. 48. 5 1911 S. C. 701. 6 1913 S. C. 227. 7 1913 S. C. 662, 1914 S. C. (H. L.) 40. 8 1911 S. C. 533. 9 [1912] A. C. 44. 10 [1915] 2 K. B. 81, [1916] 1 A. C. 11 Supra, House of Lords Cases. 12 [1920] A. C. 1001. 1 1911 S. C. 660. 2 [1911] 2 K. B. 747. 3 [1920] A. C. 1001. 4 [191......
-
Girard v. The King,
...contended that Girard was 13 years of age :at the time of the accident, and that he should. not, (1) (1915) A.C. 880. (2) (1915) 2, K.B. 81. (3).(1915) 2 K.B. 94. 102 EXCHEQUER COURT REPORTS. [VOL. XVI. 1916under secs. 3829 and 3833 (R.S.Q., 1909) have been GIRARD employed i......