Heyting v Dupont

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1963
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
12 cases
  • Pang Ten Fatt and Another v Tawau Transport Company Sdn Bhd and Others
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • January 1, 1993
  • John Ralph Hart v Karen Hart
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • May 11, 2018
    ...44 In support of these propositions, Mr Armstrong referred to a number of authorities: Westminster Bank Ltd v Edwards [1942] AC 529; Heyting v Dupont [1963] 1 WLR 1192; Petrodel Resources Ltd v Prest [2013] 2 AC 415; In re H (Children) (Care Proceedings: Appeals out of Time) [2015] 1 WLR ......
  • The "Opal 3" ex "Kuchino"
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • June 6, 1992
    ...In any event, even if Leninets had not raised the question of jurisdiction, it was the duty of the court to do so: see Heyting v Dupont [1963] 1 WLR 1192[1963] 3 All ER 97 and Third Chandris Shipping Corp v Unimarine SA. [1979] QB 645[1979] 2 All ER 972 Registration of By comity of maritime......
  • The "Ohm Mariana" ex "Peony"
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • March 11, 1992
    ...for the court to take them`: per Lawton LJ in Third Chandris Shipping Corp v Unimarine SA [1979] QB 645 at p 659. In Heyting v Dupont [1963] 1 WLR 1192 Plowman J said that he regarded it his duty to consider on his own initiative whether he had the jurisdiction to adjudicate the claims befo......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Action
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Sasegbon’s Laws of Nigeria. Volume 1 Action
    • September 8, 2016
    ...cases. Incidentally the Court in Abubakri v. Smith (supra) approved of, and applied the reasoning of Plowman, J., in Neyting v. Dupont (1963) 1 W.L.R. 1192 who, instead of dismissing the plaintiff’s claim merely indicated that he had no jurisdiction to adjudicate upon the plaintiff’s claim ......
  • Jurisdiction
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Sasegbon's Laws of Nigeria. Volume 13 Jurisdiction
    • July 10, 2016
    ...cases. Incidentally the Court in Abubakri v. Smith (supra) approved of, and applied the reasoning of Plowman, J. in Heyting v. Dupont (1963) 1 W.L.R. 1192 who, instead of dismissing the plaintiff’s claim merely indicated that he had no jurisdiction to adjudicate upon the plaintiff’s claim s......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT