Hibbert v McKiernan
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1948 |
| Year | 1948 |
| Court | King's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
16 cases
-
Warner v Metropolitan Police Commissioner; R v Warner
...finders of goods on premises ( Bridges v. Hawkesworth 21 L.J.Q.B. 75; South Stafford-shire Water Co. v. Sharman [1896] 2 Q.B. 44; Hibbert v. McKiernan [1948] 2 K.B. 142) or in relation to sovereign immunity ( U.S.A. v. Dollfus Mieg u.s.) That the solution adopted ultimately depends upon t......
-
Parker v British Airways Board
...the soil and so subject to different considerations. It is also reflected in the judgment of Lord Goddard C.J. in Hibbert v. Mckiernan, (1948) 2 K.B. 142 at page 149. That was a criminal case concerning the theft of "lost" golf balls on the private land of a club. The only issue was whethe......
-
The State v Francis Kumo Gene [1991] PNGLR 33
...we are now concerned to specify the owner of the property concerned: see the observations of Lord Goddard CJ in Hibbert v McKiernan [1948] 2 KB 142. But where the property is of a common and undistinctive type (as is the case with Francis Kumo Gene), in order that the accused person may kno......
-
Tabe v R
...AC 582 at 605. 4Director of Public Prosecutions v Brooks [1974] AC 862 at 866. 5 (1978) 140 CLR 591 at 610. 6 eg Hibbert v McKiernan [1948] 2 KB 142; Moors v Burke (1919) 26 CLR 7 eg South Staffordshire Water Company v Sharman [1896] 2 QB 44. 8 cf Williams v The Queen (1978) 140 CLR 591. 9 ......
Get Started for Free
6 books & journal articles
-
Cases referred to in 1963
...A.C. 550. 145 Hadida v. Fordham & Sons Ltd. (1893) 10 T.L.R. 139. 175 Hatton v. Harris (1892) A.C. 547. 128 Hibbert v. McKiernan (1948) 1 All E.R. 860. 255 Hickman v. Kent or Romney Marsh Sheepbreeders' Association (1920) 37 T.L.R. 163. 115 Hilton v. Earl of Granvill (1841) Cr. & Ph. 283 (4......
-
Preliminary Sections
...1 Q.B.309, C.A. [1962] 2 All E R 380 28 Hedley Bryne & Co.Ltd. v. Heller & Partners Ltd. (1940) A.C. 465. 67 Hibbert v. McKiernan [1948] 2 K.B. 142, 150; [1948] 1 All E.R. 860. . . 220 Houstoun v. Marquis of Sligo (1885) 29 Ch.D. 448; 52 LT. 96; 1 T.LR. 217 291 Hunter v. Wright [1938] 2 All......
-
Cases referred to in 1967
...1 Q.B.309, C.A. [1962] 2 All E R 380 28 Hedley Bryne & Co.Ltd. v. Heller & Partners Ltd. (1940) A.C. 465. 67 Hibbert v. McKiernan [1948] 2 K.B. 142, 150; [1948] 1 All E.R. 860. . . 220 Houstoun v. Marquis of Sligo (1885) 29 Ch.D. 448; 52 LT. 96; 1 T.LR. 217 291 Hunter v. Wright [1938] 2 All......
-
Abandonment, copyright and orphaned works: what does it mean to take the proprietary nature of intellectual property rights seriously?
...argue that it acquires rights as occupier of the land on which the bike was left. For similar arguments, see, eg, Hibbert v McKiernan [1948] 2 KB 142 (trespasser took from a golf course eight balls that had been abandoned by their owners; however, the occupier had a sufficient interest in t......
Get Started for Free