Hicks v Hicks
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1802 |
| Year | 1802 |
| Court | King's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v Islington London Borough Council
...his capital premium repaid to him with interest, subject to giving credit for the instalments of the annuity which he had received. 39In Hicks v Hicks (1802) 3 East 16, the action was brought by the plaintiff for money had and received to recover the consideration money paid many years ago......
-
Guinness Mahon and Company Ltd v Kensington and Chelsea London Borough Council
...by which Islington have been unjustly enriched." 15 There is in that passage an echo of the judgment of Lord Ellenborough CJ in Hicks v Hicks (1802) 3 East 16 where in one of the annuity cases he said: "This was either an annuity or not an annuity. If not an annuity, the sums paid on either......
-
School Facility Management Ltd v Governing Body of Christ the King College
...As is implicit in the action for money had and received on the ground of unjust enrichment and as was expressly held in Hicks v Hicks (1802) 3 East 16, 102 ER 502, the claim cannot be asserted without at the same time giving credit for any payments received. As a matter of the principle of ......
-
Guinness Mahon & Company Ltd v Kensington and Chelsea Royal Borough Council
...AC 32. Goss v ChilcottELR[1996] AC 788. Hazell v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough CouncilELR[1992] 2 AC 1. Hicks v HicksENR(1802) 3 East 16; 102 ER 502. Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Sandwell Borough CouncilUNK[1994] 4 All ER 890. Linz v Electric Wire Co of Palestine LtdELR[1948] AC 371. Midl......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
MAJOR DEVELOPMENTS IN THE LAW OF RESTITUTION
...B. & C. 651. 33 Bromley v. Holland and Tyrell (1802) G.Coop. 16, 23 and, in the decree, 24. 34 Byne v. Potter (1800) 5 Ves. Jun. 609. 35 (1802) 3 East 16, 17. 36 (1805) 6 B. & C. 651. 37 (1833) 3 Mo. & S. 219, 228. 38 (1888) 39 Ch.D. 190, 203. 39 (1827) 6 B.& C. 651. 40 G.H.Treitel, The Law......