Hill v Baxter

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1958
Date1958
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
73 cases
  • Allied Bank (M) Bhd v Yau Jiok Hua
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1998
  • Attorney General's Reference (No. 2 of 1992)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 27 May 1993
    ...arises only where there is such total destruction of voluntary control that the defendant cannot be said to be driving at all. He cited Hill v Baxter 1958 42 CAR 51 in which Lord Goddard CJ said: 20 "I agree that there may be cases where the circumstances are such that the accused could not......
  • R v Smith (Stanley)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 2 July 1979
    ...of that type of help. We are assisted to that view by a passage in the judgment of Mr. Justice Devlin (as he then was) in the case of Hill v. Baxter which is to be found in volume 42 Cr. App. Rep. page 59. The report starts at page 51 and the passage I wish to cite is at page 59. 17 Before ......
  • Moses v Winder
    • United Kingdom
    • Divisional Court
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Sovereignty, Restraint, & Guidance. Canadian Criminal Law in the 21st Century
    • 25 June 2019
    ...Hill v Baxter, [1958] 1 QB 277 ..................................................................................................... 312 Hill v Church of Scientology of Toronto, [1995] 2 SCR 1130 ............................... 128, 297 Hills v Canada (Attorney General), [1988] 1 SCR 513 ........
  • A More Modest Principle of Voluntariness
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Sovereignty, Restraint, & Guidance. Canadian Criminal Law in the 21st Century
    • 25 June 2019
    ...this approach. 13 Hundal , above note 11 at 875, Cory J. 14 Ibid at 875–76. See also the discussion of Lord Goddard in Hill v Baxter [1958] 1 QB 277 at 283, as well as the subsequent analysis in S Prevezer, “Automatism and Involuntary Conduct” [1958] Criminal Law Review 440; J Ll J Edwards,......
  • Causing Death by Dangerous Driving
    • United Kingdom
    • Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles No. 36-5, May 1963
    • 1 May 1963
    ...the driver. S wasconvicted. (R. v. Sibbles (1959) Crim. L.R. 660.) The standard caseon"automatism", is,ofcourse, Hill v, Baxter [1958] 1 All E.R.193; [1958] 1 Q.B. 277.The mental element was dealt with at some length in the appealcaseofR. v. Evans [1962] 3 W.L.R. 1457; (1963) Crim. L.R. 112......
  • Case Comment
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Criminology (formerly Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology) No. 11-2, June 1978
    • 1 June 1978
    ...note 5; Blair, D,"Medico-legal Aspects of Automatism" (1977) 17 Medicine, ScienceandLaw 167.4 See forexampleHill vBaxter [1958] 1 QB 277; [1958] 1 All ER 193; R v Sibbles [1959]CrimLR660; Watmore vJenkins [1962] 3 WLR 463; [1962] 2 All ER 868; R v Sell [1962]CrimLR 463.5HMAdvocatevRitchie o......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT