Hill v Caillovel
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | High Court of Chancery |
| Judgment Date | 26 October 1748 |
| Date | 26 October 1748 |
English Reports Citation: 27 E.R. 931
HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY
hill v. caillovel, Oct. 26,1748. Post Obit, security. Bond by A. in 1720 for payment in six months after his father's death, if he survived, otherwise to be void; the father then seventy, and dies in 1731, A. in 1734 ; no relief against the penalty ; there being no proof of imposition although suspicious circumstances in it. (See, however, Supplement, p. 297; and Evans v. Chesshire, Supplement, p. 300.) Thomas Hill at the age of twenty-four in 1720 entered into a bond to Isaac Caillovel for the payment of 520 within six months after his father's death, if he survived him : if not, to be void ; the father being then seventy. The obligee died in 1720, his executor in 1722 assigned it for valuable consideration, for ought that appeared to the contrary, to Lane; the father died in 1731, after his death and the death of Lane, letters were wrote to the son...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
In. The Matter of The Gwelo (Matabeleland) Exploration and Development Company, Ltd (Williamson's Claim.)
...11 Eq. 478. Ex parte MackensieELR L. R. 7 Eq. 240. Fountaine v. The Carmarthen Railway CompanyELR L. R. 5 Eq. 316. Hill v. CailovelENR 1 Ves. Sen. 122. In re Agra and Masterman's BankELR L. R. 2 Ch. App. 391. In re Blakeley Ordnance CompanyELR L. R.3 Ch. App. 154. In re General Estates Co E......
-
The "Edmond"
...The assignee of a chose in action takes subject to all the equities against the assignor, Turton v. Benson (1 P Wins 496); Hill v. Caillovd (1 Ves. Sen. 122), and the mortgagee had an equity that the owner taking or assigning the freight should pay the expenses of earning it. The assignment......
