Hillingdon London Borough Council v ARC Ltd (No 2)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1997 |
| Date | 1997 |
| Year | 1997 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 cases
-
Tinkler v Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs
...being no conduct “crossing the line” is provided by the Court of Appeal's decision in Hillingdon London Borough Council v ARC Ltd (No 2) [2000] 3 EGLR 97. It can therefore be seen that, coming into Benchdollar, estoppel by convention was well-established in English law as were many of its c......
-
ACE Insurance SA-NV v SURENDRANATH SEECHURN [CA (Civil), 06/02/2002]
...proceeding." The same principle will apply here. 22 The point arose directly in Hillingdon Borough Council v A.R.C. Ltd. (No. 2) [2000] 3 E.G.L.R. 97, a case drawn to our attention by Mr Stuart-Smith but to which unfortunately the judge was not referred. In that case, like this, the parties......
-
Super Chem Products Ltd v American Life and General Insurance Company Ltd and Others
...happens if the negotiations break down, cannot give rise to a waiver or estoppel: Hillingdon London Borough Council v ARC Ltd (No 2) [2000] 3 EGLR 97, at 104, per Arden LJ; Seechurn v ACE Insurance SA [2002] 2 Lloyd's LR 390. Nothing in the exchanges in the present case is therefore capable......
-
John Richard Saunders v Caerphilly County Borough Council
...of compensation had not been agreed or determined. He granted the acquiring authority permission to appeal, which it did. In Hillingdon LBC v ARC Ltd (No 1) [1999] ChD 139 CA, the Court of Appeal upheld that decision. Both parties were represented by counsel highly experienced in the field,......
Request a trial to view additional results