Hines v King Sturge LLP
| Jurisdiction | Scotland |
| Year | 2010 |
| Date | 2010 |
| Court | Court of Session (Inner House - Extra Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Ann Thomson V. Scottish Ministers
...circumstances and context were important: Customs and Excise Commissioners v Barclays Bank plc [2007] 1 AC 181, Hines v King Sturge LLP 2011 SLT 2. The present case was not novel. It fell within a recognised category of case: the general category being liability for the deliberate wrongdoin......
-
Thomson v The Scottish Ministers
...circumstances and context were important: Customs and Excise Commissioners v Barclays Bank plcELR[2007] 1 AC 181, Hines v King Sturge LLP2011 SLT 2. The present case was not novel. It fell within a recognised category of case: the general category being liability for the deliberate wrongdoi......
-
Nram Plc Against Jane Steel And Bell & Scott Llp
...111, per Lord Hodge at paragraphs 36-40; Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Bannerman Johnstone Maclay 2005 1 SC 437; Hines v King Sturge LLP 2011 SLT 2, per Lord Osborne at paragraph 45. [45] If it was the case that the first defender owed the pursuers a duty of care there was no basis for concl......
-
James Percy V. Govan Initiative Limited
...have got the loan had he not been in the wrong catchment area. [25] Mr McKenzie then went on, under reference to Hines v King Sturge LLP 2011 SLT 2, to explain why he conceded that a Proof before Answer was necessary to deal with his argument on duty of care but I need not go into the detai......