Hipgrave v Case

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1884
Date1884
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
20 cases
  • Johnson v Agnew
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 13 December 1977
    ...specific performanceimpracticable by their default under the mortgages which resulted in the sales by the mortgagees. He relied upon Hipgrave v. Case 28 Chancery Division, 556, in support of this submission. In that case the plaintiff vendor sued for specific performance of a contract for t......
  • Insofex Sdn Bhd v Labasama Group Sdn Bhd
    • Malaysia
    • Unspecified court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Labasama Group (M) Sdn Bhd v Insofex Sdn Bhd
    • Malaysia
    • Court of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Surrey County Council and Another v Bredero Homes Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 7 April 1993
    ... ... 850 at 855. That rule has been referred to in argument in the present case as the "conventional" rule ... 21 Sir William Goodhart, Q.C., for the plaintiffs, has pointed out that the conventional rule ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT