HM ADVOCATE v ANDREW ROY ROOSE Accused
| Jurisdiction | Scotland |
| Neutral Citation | 1999 SCCR 259 |
| Date | 1999 |
| Court | High Court of Justiciary |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
Webster v Dominick
...Cases referred to: Advocate (HM) v MillbankUNK 2002 SLT 1116; 2002 SCCR 771 Advocate (HM) v RKUNK 1994 SCCR 499 Advocate (HM) v RooseUNK 1999 SCCR 259 Advocate (Lord), PetrSCUNK 1998 JC 209; 1999 SLT 405; 1998 SCCR 401 Batty v HM AdvocateSCUNK 1995 JC 160; 1995 SLT 1047; 1995 SCCR 525 Carli......
-
Procurator Fiscal, Dunoon V. Allan Dominick
...for which the Crown considered the penalty to be inadequate, the Crown could proceed at common law (at p. 529D-E). [38]In HM Adv v Roose (1999 SCCR 259) the trial judge, Lord Marnoch, checked this line of development. The accused was charged with shameless indecency in having had intercours......
-
McNeil v HM Advocate
...sought restrictions recorded in relation to others. Cases referred to: Advocate (HM) v Philp (1890) 2 White 525 Advocate (HM) v RooseUNK 1999 SCCR 259 Advocate's (Lord) Reference (No 1 of 2001), ReUNK 2002 SLT 466; 2002 SCCR 435 Creighton v HM Advocate (1904) 4 Adam 356; (1904) 12 SLT 36 P ......