HM Advocate v Thomson and Dick
| Jurisdiction | Scotland |
| Neutral Citation | 2006 SCCR 265 |
| Year | 2006 |
| Date | 2006 |
| Court | High Court of Justiciary |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Her Majesty's Advocate V. David Graham
... ... in tendering the plea must be reflected in the amount of the discount that this court can properly allow (cf my observations in HM Adv v Thomson 2006 SCCR 265, at para [27]). [57] In Spence v HM Adv ( supra , at para [14]), the court took the view that a clear indication of an ... ...
-
Gemmell, Robertson, Gibson and McCourt v HM Advocate
...v GrahamSCUNK [2010] HCJAC 50; 2011 JC 1; 2010 SLT 715; 2010 SCCR 641; 2010 SCL 789 Advocate (HM) v Thomson and anrUNK [2006] HCJAC 32; 2006 SCCR 265; 2006 GWD 11-205 Attorney-General's Reference (No 7 of 1989) (Re) sub nom R v ThorntonUNK (1990-91) 12 Cr App R (S) 1; [1990] Crim LR 436 Bal......
-
Her Majesty's Advocate V. Adam Lyttel
...discount is inevitable (cf Gemmell v HM Adv 2011HCJAC 129, at para [424]; Graham v HM Adv 2010 SCCR 641, at para [56]; Thomson v HM Adv 2006 SCCR 265, at para [27]). In the result the value of the plea was reduced by the fact that there had to be two preliminary hearings, and the preparatio......
-
Stephen Murray V. Her Majesty's Advocate
...obvious that this cannot be regarded as a plea that was tendered at the earliest opportunity. I discussed this point in HM Adv v Thomson (2006 SCCR 265) and again in Gemmell v HM Adv (at para [42]). It is apparent that on this point, the appeal has been brought on a misunderstanding. One-th......