Ho Tung v Man on Insurance Company

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
CourtPrivy Council
Judgment Date1902
Date1902
Year1902

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
20 cases
  • Mr Desmond Gunewardena v Conran Holdings Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 22 November 2016
    ...effect of filing and registration. However, one of the cases that he relied on in relation to his next point, namely Ho Tung v Man On Insurance Company Ltd [1902] AC 232 is implicitly against him on this point. In that case the Articles submitted for registration were not signed, but were r......
  • Prospect Properties Ltd ((in Liquidation)) v McNeill
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 3 December 1990
    ...[1920] 1 Ch. 466. (15) Greenhalgh v. Arderne Cinemas Ltd., [1951] Ch. 286; [1950] 2 All E.R. 1120. (16) Ho Tung v. Man On Ins. Co. Ltd., [1902] A.C. 232, considered. (17) Horsley & Weight Ltd., In re, [1982] Ch. 442; [1982] 3 All E.R. 1045. (18) Kinsela v. Russell Kinsela Property Ltd.UNK(1......
  • Ahmad Hamad Algosaibi and Brothers Company (“AHAB”) v Saad Investments Company Ltd (in Official Liquidation) (“SICL”) and Others
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 31 May 2018
    ...consistent with the information which El Ayouty had shown me.” 2004 {Day65/18:1} 2005 [1895] 1 Ch 674 2006 [1897] A.C. 22 {R1/4} 2007 [1902] A.C 232, 235 {R1/4.3} 2008 [1920] I Ch 426 2009 [1969] 2 Ch 365, 373 {R1/8.4} 2010 [1975] Ch 52 {R1/9.2.2} 2011 1990–1991 CILR 171 {R1/16.2.1} 2012......
  • Prospect Properties Ltd ((in Liquidation)) v McNeill et Al
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 3 December 1990
    ...of acquiescence may have the same effect as a special resolution. That principle is to be found in Ho Tung v Man On Insurance Co. Ltd. (1902) AC 232. In that case the company's articles had been registered and acted upon for nineteen years. They had not, however, been signed as required by ......
  • Get Started for Free