Hobbes' Individualistic Analysis of the Family

AuthorJohn Zvesper
Date01 October 1985
Published date01 October 1985
DOI10.1111/j.1467-9256.1985.tb00111.x
Subject MatterArticle
28.
Sue
Easton
the significant factors in transforming women into 'legitimate'
objects
of
violence. Jealousy and possessiveness as well as a
perceived inadequate performance
of
domestic tasks were predominant
precipitating causes
of
abuse in the cases they examined.
References
Camus,
A
(1962), The Rebel (London, Peregrine).
Davidoff,
L
(1976mationalisation of Housework', in
D
L
Barker and
S
Allen (eds), Dependence and Exploitation in Work and Marriage
(London, Longman)
,
pp 12
1-5
1.
(London, Hutchi nson).
Delphy,
C
(1984), Close to Home:
A
Materialist Analysis of Women's Oppression
Dobash,
R
E
and Dobash,
R
(1979), Violence Against Wives (New York, Free Press).
Easton,
S
M
(1984), 'Hegel and Feminism', Radical Philosophy,
38.
Elshtain,
J
B
(1981), Public Man Private Woman (Oxford, Martin Robertson).
Harding,
S
and
Hintikka,MB(edS)o,vering
Reality, Feminist
Persdectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology and Philosophy
of
Science (Dordrecht, Reidel).
transl.
J
Baillie.
T
M
Knox.
W
Wallace and
A
V
Miller.
(Cambridge, University Press), transl.
H
B
Nisbet.
Hegel,
G
W
F
(1931), The Phenomenology
of
Mind (London, Allen and Unwin),
Hegel,
G
W
F (1952), Phi losophy of Right (Oxford, Clarendon Press), transl.
Hegel,
G
W
F
(1971), Philosophy of Mind (Oxford, Clarendon Press), transl.
Hegel,
G
W
F
(1975), Lectures on the Philosophy of World History, Introduction
Hegel,
G
W
F
(1977), 'Fragments of Historical Studies',
-
Clio
VII,
No
1,
pp
113-34.
Hunt,
P
(1978), 'Cash-Transactions and Household [asks: Domestic Behaviour in
Relatfon to Industrial Employment', Sociological Review 26, pp
555-71.
Lloyd,
G
(1981), 'Public Reason and Private Passion', Politics
18,
No
2,
pp 27-35.
Okin,
S
H
(1980), Women in Western Political Thought (-Virago).
-1.
-9-
-1.
.L
-L
.L
.L
-7- -1.
I.
#.
,.
*.
I.
I.
,,
,,
.\
HOBBES'
INDIVIDUALISTIC ANALYSIS OFTHE FAMILY
John
Zvesper
In order to understand human nature and natural rights, liberal political
thinkers have abstracted from people as they exist, as members of particular
societies,with particular identities, differences, relations, and obligations,
and have tried to imagine the essential human being, who
is
not only class-
less and raceless but also
-
even more paradoxically
-
sexless, free
of
family and ethnic ties, parentless and childless. Lacking the support
available from these relations, humans are imagined to live
as
Thomas Hobbes
describes them in the state of nature, 'without other security, than what
their own strength, and their own invention shall furnish them withall'
(Leviathan, Chapter 13). This individualism is easy to criticise, and both
conservative and radical critics
of
liberalism generally scorn such abstract
thinking. However, feminist critics
of
early liberalism have usually found not too

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT