Hoerter v Hanover
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1893 |
| Date | 1893 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
31 cases
- Hong Kim Sui v Malayan Banking Bhd
-
Wong, Wen-Young v Grand View Private Trust Company Ltd
...of law is raised. See Campbell v Vickers [2002] Bda LR 3, SC, per Meerabux J at page 3, citing Electric Corporation v Thompson-Houston 10 TLR 103. On the other hand, there will be cases where the Court has heard full argument on the question and where the facts necessary to resolve it are n......
-
Wong, Wen-Young (also known as Winston Wong) and Wong, Ray-Tseng (also known as Riley Wong) (an infant by his Next Friend, Grace Tsu Han Wong) v Grand View Private Trust Company Ltd
...law is raised. See Campbell v. Vickers [2002] Bda L.R. 3, SC, per Meerabux, J. at page 3, citing Electric Corporation v. Thompson-Houston 10 T.L.R. 103. On the other hand, there will be cases where the Court has heard full argument on the question and where the facts necessary to resolve it......
-
Alasan Penghakiman Wa-22Ncc-77-02-2022 Galvapole v Yang Fong Me Engineering Another
...as to matters of law arises, summary judgment under O. 14 should not be granted. (Electric and General Corpn. v.Thomson-Houston Electric 10 TLR 103). But, however difficult the point of law is, once it is understood and the Court is satisfied that it is really unarguable it will give final ......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
The 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements
...at 237.58Idem at 238.59Ultisol v Bouygues supra note 55 at 144.60Hoerter & Another v Hanover Caoutchouc, Gutta Percha, & TelegraphWorks (1893) 10 TLR 103(CA).61Bell op cit note 48 at 5.56.(2007) 19 SA Merc LJ148© Juta and Company (Pty) contrast, there is no such obligation and the parties h......
-
THE NEW ORDER 14A (SUMMARY DISPOSAL OF POINTS OF LAW OR CONSTRUCTION) — MORE THAN A CODIFICATION OF EXISTING PRACTICE
...such allowance in these circumstances so that it can have the benefit of hearing arguments which have been thoughtfully prepared.98 1 (1895) 10 TLR 103. 2 Ibid. Also see Lim & Tan Securities Pte Ltd v Sunbird Pte Ltd[1992] 1 SLR 258, at p 265 (novelty of legal issues); Sethia (SL) Liners Lt......