Holder v The Queen
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1978 |
| Date | 1978 |
| Year | 1978 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 cases
-
Gonzalez v R
...Jo. 170, followed. (8) Billet, In reELR(1887), 12 App. Cas. 459; 56 L.T. 615; 3 T.L.R. 492; 36W.R. 81;16Cox, C.C. 241. (9) Holder v. R., [1980] A.C. 115; (1978), 122 Sol. Jo. 681; 68 Cr. App. R. 120; [1978] Crim. L.R. 685, followed. (10) Ibrahim v. R., [1914] A.C. 599; [1914–15] All E.R. Re......
- Martin (Frank) v The State
- Vivekanand Singh, Hazrath Hussain, Hafeez Hussain and Tola Persaud v The State
-
Bascombe v The Queen
...In this court, counsel restates these objections and relies on R. v. Bedingfield (1879) 14 Cox 341; Ratten v. The Queen [1972] A.C. 378; Holder v. R. (1979) 68 Cr. App. R. 120; Andrews [1987] 2 W.L.R. 413. 61 We find that this ground is misconceived and must fail. Inspector Johnson, in the ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Court of Appeal
...as of right in a criminalmatter, since special leave granted on the advice of the Board hadfirst to be obtained; see Holder v. The Queen[1980]A.C. 115.Ithas, moreover, been the practice of the Board to advise that suchleave be granted only where the Board considered that a reallyserious mis......