Holland v HM Advocate
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 2005 |
| Year | 2005 |
| Date | 2005 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Neilly v R
... ... Queen [2008] UKPC 11 , para 9.) The benefits of an identification parade and the weaknesses of a dock identification were summarised in Holland v HM Advocate [2005] UKPC D1 , 2005 SC (PC) 1 , 17, para 47: "…identification parades offer safeguards which are not available when ... ...
-
Misick and Others v The Queen (Turks and Caicos)
... ... Advocate [2005] UKPC D1 ; 2006 SC 1 , paras 57–62, independence has a separate significance, apart from ensuring impartiality between the parties to ... ...
-
Jason Lawrence v The Queen
...of the five cases, to which we have referred, to the circumstances of this appeal. In the others there had been no identification parade. In Holland Lord Rodger of Earlsferry spoke (at para 58) of "the peculiar dangers of a dock identification where a witness previously failed to identify a......
-
Leslie Pipersburgh and Another v The Queen
... ... In effect, the Court of Appeal ran the two issues together ... 15 In Holland v HM Advocate [2005] UKPC D1 ; 2005 1 SC (PC) 3 the Board was concerned with the contention that dock identifications of the accused, where the ... ...