Holland v Leslie
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1894 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
Donohue v. Armco Inc. et al., (2001) 294 N.R. 356 (HL)
...Tunnel Group Ltd. v. Balfour Beatty Construction Ltd., [1993] A.C. 334; 152 N.R. 177 (H.L.), refd to. [para. 21]. Holland v. Leslie, [1894] 2 Q.B. 346, refd to. [para. Beck v. Value Capital Ltd. (No. 2), [1975] 1 W.L.R. 6, affd. [1976] 1 W.L.R. 572 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 21]. Johnson v. Ta......
- Kaplands Sdn Bhd v Lee Chin Cheng Dengkil Oil Palm Plantations Sdn Bhd
-
Beecham Group Plc and Another v Norton Healthcare Ltd and Others
...So there was no point in refusing the amendment and every reason for allowing it. That view was supported by Holland v LeslieELR ([1894] 2 QB 346) and Beck v ValueWLR ([1975] 1 WLR 6). The next question of principle concerned the Norton companies. Beecham's cause of action in breach of conf......
-
Masri v Consolidated Contractors International UK Ltd and Others (No. 2)
...that permission has to be obtained within the four corners of the English long-arm statute for each separate claim made against him: see Holland v Leslie [1894] 2 QB 346 and Waterhouse v Reid [1938] 1 All ER 235, [1938] 1 KB 743.” 74 In my judgment the decision in Glencore International ......
Request a trial to view additional results