Holroyd v Berry
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1973 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
Public Prosecutor v Mohamed Fuad Bin Abdul Samad
...a driving licence is important or vital to an Accused person’s employment (see Gordon v Smith [1971] Crim. L.R. 173; Holroyd v Berry [1973] R.T.R. 145). Even if 'special reasons' were established, it did not automatically mean that an Accused would not be disqualified. The judge must go thr......
-
Public Prosecutor v Mohd Hemly Bin Ramdan
...that a driving licence is important or vital to an Accused person’s employment (seeGordon v Smith[1971] Crim. L.R. 173;Holroyd v Berry[1973] R.T.R. 145). Even if 'special reasons' were established, it did not automatically mean that an Accused would not be disqualified. The judge must go th......
-
Public Prosecutor v Mohamad Faizal bin Mohd Alias
...that a driving licence is important or vital to an Accused person’s employment (seeGordon v Smith[1971] Crim. L.R. 173; Holroyd v Berry[1973] R.T.R. 145). There must be a separate process of considering whether the discretion must be exercised in favour of the offender. Hence, the limited d......
-
Public Prosecutor v Vasudevan s/o Thambyrajah
...that a driving licence is important or vital to an Accused person’s employment (see Gordon v Smith[1971] Crim. L.R. 173;Holroyd v Berry[1973] R.T.R. 145). There must be a separate process of considering whether the discretion must be exercised in favour of the offender. Hence, the limited d......
Request a trial to view additional results