Holt Southey Ltd v Catnic Components Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1978 |
| Year | 1978 |
| Date | 1978 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
37 cases
-
Stonegate Securities Ltd v Gregory
...notice of appeal. 21 In the course of the argument we were referred to the decision of Mr. Justice Goulding in the case of Holt Southey Ltd. v. Catnic Components Ltd; indeed, that was a case which was referred to by the Vice-Chancellor in his judgment under appeal. In that case a statutory ......
-
Stonegate Securities Ltd v Gregory
...notice of appeal. 21 In the course of the argument we were referred to the decision of Mr. Justice Goulding in the case of Holt Southey Ltd. v. Catnic Components Ltd; indeed, that was a case which was referred to by the Vice-Chancellor in his judgment under appeal. In that case a statutory ......
- Catnic Components Ltd and Another v Hill and Smith Ltd
-
Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd v Warner Lambert Company
... ... CONVENTION ON THE GRANT OF EUROPEAN PATENTS 1973 ART 69 CATNIC COMPONENTS LTD v HILL & SMITH LTD 1982 RPC 183 GENERAL TYRE & ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
RESTRAINING A CALL ON A PERFORMANCE BOND: SHOULD ‘FRAUD OR UNCONSCIONABILITY’ BE THE NEW ORTHODOXY?
...of the matter (Bryanston Finance Ltd v De Vries (No 2)[1976] 2 WLR 41, at 55—56; applied in Holt Southey Ltd v Catnic Components Ltd[1978] 1 WLR 630); (c) there is a clear breach of covenant (Doherty v Allman(1878) 3 App Cas 709, at 720, approved in Hampstead & Suburban Properties Ltd v Dio......
-
Management and Enforcement
..., above note 397; Lam Inc. v. Johns-Manville Corp. , 718 F.2d 1056 (Fed. Cir. 1983); Catnic Components Ltd. v. Hill & Smith Ltd. , [1983] F.S.R. 512 at 528–30 (Pat. Ct.). INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW 634 so “springboard” damages to compensate for loss flowing from this benefit have been awar......
-
WINDING UP PETITIONS FOUNDED ON A BONA FIDE DISPUTED DEBT
...Ch 63; Fortuna Holdings Pty Ltd v Deputy Federal Commissioner of Taxation, supra, note 2, at 87; Holt Southey Ltd v Catnic Components Ltd[1978] 1 WLR 630 at 632B; Mincom Pty Ltd v Murphy[1983] 1 Qd R 297 at 305D—E; Re Julius Harper Ltd, supra, note 11, at 217; Exchange Finance Co Ltd v Lemm......