Holt v Dyson
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Year | 1950 |
Date | 1950 |
Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
R v Immigration appeal tribunal ex parte Mariam Chumun and Another
...v BlackELR [1912] 1 KB 316. Retail Dairy Co Ltd v ClarkeELR [1912] 2 KB 388. Stanley v ThomasELR [1939] 2 KB 462. Holt v DysonELRUNK [1951] 1 KB 364: [1950] 2 All ER 840. T O Supplies (London) Ltd v Jerry CreightonELRUNK [1952] 1 KB 42: [1951] 2 All ER 992. Sandland v NealeELRUNK [1956] 1 Q......
-
R v County of London Quarter Sessions Appeals Committee, ex parte Rossi
...post" to the offender, it has been heldagain that "sent" merely no ans dispatched, c.f. Stanley V. Thomas 1939 2 King's Bench, 462, Holt v. Dyson, 1951 1 King's Bench 364, and Sandland v. Neale, 1955 3 All England Reports 571. On the other hand, in The Queen v. The Recorder of Richmond, 1......
-
London Artists Ltd v Littler; Grade Organisation Ltd v Littler; Associated Television Ltd v Littler; Grade v Littler
...on which the comment is based; and the defendant can be ordered to give particulars of those facts, see Cunningham Howie v. Dimbleby (1951 1 K.B. 364). So long as that implication is read into the plea, it is unobjectionable. 18 Three points arise on the defence of fair comment. Firstly, Wa......
-
Parry v Brantley; Benjamin et Al v Brantley; Daniel v Brantley
...316; Retail Dairy Company, Limited v. Clark [1912] 2 K.B. 388; Stanley v. Thomas [1939] 2 K.B. 462; Stewart v. Chapman [1951] 2 K.B. 792; Holt v. Dyson [1951] 1 K.B. 364). That was so even if the failure to reach the recipient in time was due to the fault of the Post Office. 62 What the Cou......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Divisional Court Cases
...in circumstances in which it would be likelytoreach him before the 14 days had elapsed.Laterin Holt v. 104THEJOURNALOFCRIMINALLAWDyson, (1951 1K.B.364; 1951 J.C.L. 147) a Court presidedover byLordGoddard, C.J. whilenotdissenting fromtheprinciple enunciated byLordHewart distinguished the cas......