Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United Kingdom | +44 (0) 20 7284 8080

Hood v Anchor Line (Henderson Brothers)

The Law Reports Session Cases Cited authorities 12 Cited in 60 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date01 July 1918
Date01 July 1918
Docket NumberNo. 14.
CourtHouse of Lords
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
43 cases
  • Chua Chye Leong Alan v Grand Palace De-luxe Nite Club Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 12 Julio 1993
    ...Ltd v Larkin Brothers (London's Commercial Photographers) Ltd [1934] 1 KB 191 (distd) Hood v Anchor Line (Henderson Brothers), Limited [1918] AC 837 (distd) Kua Lee Ngoh v Jagindar Singh [1987] SLR (R) 119; [1987] SLR 239 (refd) Maritime Coastal Containers Ltd v Shelburne Marine Ltd (1982) ......
  • Capes (Hatherden) Ltd v Western Arable Services Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
  • Cockerton v Naviera Aznar S.A.
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
  • White v Blackmore
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 15 Junio 1972
    ...himself from liability to a passenger, the sole question has been: Was the condition part of the contract? As Lord Dunedin said in Hood v. Anchor Line (1918) A.C. at page 846 "Duty may arise from contract or it may arise from the rules of the common law. The duty of a carrier by sea or land......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
6 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Saggerson on Travel Law and Litigation - 7th Edition Contents
    • 30 Agosto 2022
    ...517, HC 2.3, 2.32, 5.13, 5.34–5.41, 5.67, 5.117, 5.119, 5.123, 5.129, 5.204, 6.17, 6.150 Hood v Anchor Line (Henderson Brothers) Limited [1918] AC 837, 87 LJPC 156, 119 LT 684, 34 TLR 550, 62 Sol Jo 680, HL 10.358 Hook v British Airways plc; Stott v Thomas Cook Tour Operations [2012] EWCA C......
  • International Conventions and Regulations - Carriage of Passengers and Baggage
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Saggerson on Travel Law and Litigation - 7th Edition Contents
    • 30 Agosto 2022
    ...of the carrier or his employees which causes the loss. 341 337 Thompson v LM & S Railway [1930] 1 KB 41. 338 Hood v Anchor Line [1918] AC 837 at 846. 339 Gold, silver, precious stones, bank notes, stamps, furs, hand-made lace and ‘trinkets’ amongst other things. 340 To enable a suitable ext......
  • ALL‐CAPS
    • United States
    • Wiley Journal of Empirical Legal Studies No. 17-4, December 2020
    • 1 Diciembre 2020
    ...because they appear in all-caps,39as in Rottner v. AVG, where a consumer argued that34Hood v. Anchor Line (Henderson Bros.) Ltd. (1918) A.C. 837. See also Silvestri v. Italia Societa Per Azioni DiNavigazione, 388 F.2d 11, 17 (2d Cir. 1968).35Broad v. Kelly’s Olympian Co., 156 Or. 216, 233–3......
  • Justice Rand's commercial law legacy: contracts and bankruptcy policies.
    • Canada
    • University of New Brunswick Law Journal No. 61, December 2010
    • 1 Diciembre 2010
    ...effects of misrepresentation on exclusion clauses, see Curtis v. Chemical Drycleaning & Dyeing Co., [1951] 1 K.B. 805 (C.A.). (54) [1918] A.C. 837. (55) [1918] A.C. 837, at (56) (1875), L.R. 2 H.L. Sc. 470. (57) Supra note 38, at 846. (58) (1875), L.R. 2 H.L. Sc. 470, at 481, Lord O'Hag......
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT