Hood v Anchor Line (Henderson Brothers)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 July 1918 |
| Date | 01 July 1918 |
| Docket Number | No. 14. |
| Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
43 cases
-
Chua Chye Leong Alan v Grand Palace De-luxe Nite Club Pte Ltd
...Ltd v Larkin Brothers (London's Commercial Photographers) Ltd [1934] 1 KB 191 (distd) Hood v Anchor Line (Henderson Brothers), Limited [1918] AC 837 (distd) Kua Lee Ngoh v Jagindar Singh [1987] SLR (R) 119; [1987] SLR 239 (refd) Maritime Coastal Containers Ltd v Shelburne Marine Ltd (1982) ......
- Cockerton v Naviera Aznar S.A.
-
United Central Bakeries Limited V. Spooner Industries Limited+forbo Siegling (uk) Limited
...into a contract has given reasonably sufficient notice of those terms to the other party (Hood v Anchor Line (Henderson Bros) Ltd 1918 SC (HL) 143, Lord Finlay LC at 145 and Lord Dunedin at 149; Gray v LNER 1930 SC 989, Lord Justice Clerk Alness at 999). This is a question of fact which dep......
- Capes (Hatherden) Ltd v Western Arable Services Ltd
Request a trial to view additional results
6 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...517, HC 2.3, 2.32, 5.13, 5.34–5.41, 5.67, 5.117, 5.119, 5.123, 5.129, 5.204, 6.17, 6.150 Hood v Anchor Line (Henderson Brothers) Limited [1918] AC 837, 87 LJPC 156, 119 LT 684, 34 TLR 550, 62 Sol Jo 680, HL 10.358 Hook v British Airways plc; Stott v Thomas Cook Tour Operations [2012] EWCA C......
-
International Conventions and Regulations - Carriage of Passengers and Baggage
...of the carrier or his employees which causes the loss. 341 337 Thompson v LM & S Railway [1930] 1 KB 41. 338 Hood v Anchor Line [1918] AC 837 at 846. 339 Gold, silver, precious stones, bank notes, stamps, furs, hand-made lace and ‘trinkets’ amongst other things. 340 To enable a suitable ext......
-
ALL‐CAPS
...because they appear in all-caps,39as in Rottner v. AVG, where a consumer argued that34Hood v. Anchor Line (Henderson Bros.) Ltd. (1918) A.C. 837. See also Silvestri v. Italia Societa Per Azioni DiNavigazione, 388 F.2d 11, 17 (2d Cir. 1968).35Broad v. Kelly’s Olympian Co., 156 Or. 216, 233–3......
-
Justice Rand's commercial law legacy: contracts and bankruptcy policies.
...effects of misrepresentation on exclusion clauses, see Curtis v. Chemical Drycleaning & Dyeing Co., [1951] 1 K.B. 805 (C.A.). (54) [1918] A.C. 837. (55) [1918] A.C. 837, at (56) (1875), L.R. 2 H.L. Sc. 470. (57) Supra note 38, at 846. (58) (1875), L.R. 2 H.L. Sc. 470, at 481, Lord O'Hag......
Request a trial to view additional results