Horsman v Horsman ; H v H (Financial Provision: Application to Terminate Wife's Right to Periodical Payments)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1993 |
| Date | 1993 |
| Year | 1993 |
| Court | Family Division |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
5 cases
-
Shelley Mann v David Anthony Mann
...which prevents the enforcement of "stale" arrears unless there is a sound reason to allow enforcement: see H v H (Financial Provision) [1993] 2 FLR 35 at page 42, per Thorpe LJ. This is the rationale for requiring a judgment creditor to secure the court's permission in respect of arrears wh......
-
Re T (Interim Care Order: Arrangements for Contact)
...(and see the rubric at the head of the judgment itself). No other authority cited to us (including X v Y [2019] EWHC 1713 (Fam), and H v H [1993] 2 FLR 35) convincingly demonstrated that the Judge was right to regard the recitals as enforceable as if they were free-standing court 43 But ref......
-
Mark Austin v Christina Haynes
...by the court in these proceedings. That argument was rejected by Williams J for the following reasons: “33. Thorpe J in H v H (Financial Provision) [1993] 2 FLR 35 took no issue with the proposition that a recital can be enforced as if it had been an order of the court. Atkinson and another......
-
Michael Woodroffe v Pamela Woodroffe (Nee Collins)
...on the legal principles to be applied in the exercise of the court's section 36 discretion. She started by referring to H v H [1993] 2 FLR 35, in which Thorpe J had similarly commented that there did not appear to be much English authority on the principles to be applied. Further cases refe......
Get Started for Free