Horsnail v Bruce
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1865 |
| Date | 1865 |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Myles v Christian
...as amicus curiae. Cases cited: (1) Evans v. WillsELR(1876), 1 C.P.D. 229, dictum of Cockburn, C.J. applied. (2) Horsnail v. BruceELR(1873), L.R. 8 C.P. 378, observations of Bovill, C.J. and Brett J. followed. (3) Lindsay v. Wong, [1924] Clarkes Reports (4) Stonor v. FowleELR(1887), 13 App. ......
-
Wragg v Samuel Fox & Company Ltd ; Charlesworth v Samuel Fox & Company Ltd
...are in effect superseded, then, in my opinion, the proviso which qualifies them must disappear also; it has no independent existence. Horsnail v. Bruce, (1873) L.R. 8 C.P. 378, per Bovill, C. J. at p. 385. If, on the other hand, there are still cases in which these two heads can be effecti......
-
Wright v Hutchins
...for the payment of the debt by instalments, a fresh right of committal arises upon failure to pay each instalment — Horsnail v. Bruce (1873) L.R. 8 C.P. 378. But, if the order is to pay in one sum, there is no jurisdiction to commit more than once — Evans v. Wills (1876) 1 C.P.D. 229. Furth......
-
Eslee Carberry Appellant v Grenada Telecommunications Ltd Respondent
...in excess of the High Court's summary jurisdiction. Counsel referred to the following authorities: [1] Horsnail and Another v Bruce [1873] L.R. 8 C.P.378 [2] Fred Toppin and Rudolf's Limited Civ. App. No.13 of 1991 8 Learned Counsel for the appellant submitted that the apparent anomaly in t......
Request a trial to view additional results