Hortons' Estate Ltd v James Beattie Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1927 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Allen v Greenwood
...the theory of the "grumble point" (see Semon v. Bradford Corporation, (1922) 2 Chancery at 746 and 747) and to the case of Hortons Estates Ltd. v. James Beatty Ltd., (1927) 1 Chancery, 75) where the question was whether the extent of the right to light should vary according to locality, an......
-
Decision Nº ACQ 452 2009. Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), 06-10-2015
...922 Ough v King [1967] 1 WLR 1547 Deakins v Hookings [1994] 1 EGLR 190 Regan v Paul (2006) EWHC 1941 Hortons Estate Ltd v James Beattie [1927] 1 Ch 75 Midtown Ltd v City of London Real Property Co Ltd [2005] 1 EGLR 65 London, Tilbury & Southend Rly and Gower’s Walk School (1889) 24 QBD 326 ......
-
Ough v King
...an office in the City of London". 8 First, I think the Judge was entitled to have regard to the locality. I know that in Hortons Estate Limited. v. James Beattie Limited, 1927, 1 Chancery, page 75, Mr Justice Russell said that the Court should disregard the locality. He said that "the human......
-
Scott v Goulding Properties Ltd
...and on the 11th May, 1972, that court assessed the damages at £1,200] 1 [1919] 1 Ch. 24. 2 (1889) 24 Q.B.D. 326. 3 [1923] 1 Ch. 317. 4 (1926) 42 T.L.R. 701. 5 [1912] 2 Ch. 291. 6 [1961] A.C. 388. 7 [1967] 1 W.L.R. 1547. 8 [1959] I.R. 313. 9 [1951] I.R. 228. 10 [1936] I.R. 692. 11 [1937] I.R......