Houghton & Company v Nothard, Lowe & Wills Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1926
Year1926
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
39 cases
  • David Dully v Athlone Town Stadium Ltd
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Ireland)
    • 17 December 2021
    ...As the authorities cited in support of this proposition ( Underwood Ltd. v. Bank of Liverpool & Martins [1924] 1 KB 775, Houghton & Co. v. Nothard Lowe and Wills Ltd. [1927] 1 KB 246) make clear, the point being made is that where the nature of a transaction is such that an outsider shoul......
  • East Asia Company Ltd v PT Satria Tirtatama Energindo
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 27 June 2019
    ...to “go smoothly round”. However, Mr Todd did not question the following well-known passage in the judgment of Sargant LJ in Houghton & Co v Nothard, Lowe & Wills Ltd [1927] 1 KB 246, 266 in which he explained that the rule does not permit a third party to circumvent the normal rules of age......
  • Armagas Ltd v Mundogas SA (The Ocean Frost)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 18 October 1984
    ...or abnormal the employee's transaction is. This approach to the problem is not without support from judicial authority. 31In Houghton & Co. v. Nothard, Lowe & Willis, (1927) 1 KB 246, the Court of Appeal held that a company director's agreement to apply the money of one company in payment ......
  • Thanakharn Kasikorn Thai Chamkat (Mahachon) Also Known As Kasikornbank Public Co Ltd v Akai Holdings Ltd (In Liquidation
    • Hong Kong
    • Court of Final Appeal (Hong Kong)
    • 8 November 2010
    ...of apparent authority. 58. Another English Court of Appeal decision relied on by Akai is Houghton and Co. v. Nothard, Lowe and Wills Ltd [1927] 1 KB 246. There is no doubt but that, in that case, the test propounded by the Court was that proposed by Mr Kosmin. However, it was a case involvi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Die Turquand-reël : hoofstuk 7
    • South Africa
    • Sabinet Transactions of the Centre for Business Law No. 2008-43, January 2008
    • 1 January 2008
    ...(Mangal) Ltd 1964 1 All ER 630 (CA).65 ’n Tipiese voorbeeld hiervan kan gevind word in Houghton and Co v Norhard Lowe and Wills 1927 1 KB 246 (CA).66 1948 3 SA 831 A.67 Waar ’n persoon wat byvoorbeeld geldiglik aangestel is buitengewone bevoegdhede 167egter ook in Suid-Afrika dat die howe i......
  • The Turquand rule in South African company law: A(nother) suggested solution
    • South Africa
    • Juta Journal of Corporate Commercial Law & Practice No. , May 2020
    • 22 May 2020
    ...maatskappy-funksionarisse’ (1991) 3 SAMLJ 281 at 301; Delport op cit note 1 at135.8 Houghton and Co v Northard, Lowe and Wills 1927 (1) K.B. 246 at 266–7; Wolpert supra note 6 at 20; Delport op cit note 1 at 135; Du Plessis op cit note 7 at 301–2; Locke op cit note 3 at 169. 9 R Jooste ‘Ob......
  • Analyses: Contracting with Business Trusts
    • South Africa
    • Juta South Africa Mercantile Law Journal No. , August 2019
    • 16 August 2019
    ...was graphically illustrated as long ago as 1927 by two decisions of the Court of Appeal: Houghton & Co v Nothard, Lowe & Wills Ltd ([1927] 1 KB 246 (CA), especially at 266-7) and Kreditbank Cassel GmbH v Schenkers Ltd ([1927] 1 KB 826 (CA), especially at 842-3). The consequence of this aber......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT