Houlder v Weir

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date10 May 1905
Date10 May 1905
CourtKing's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
16 cases
  • Stolt Tankers Inc. v Landmark Chemicals SA
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 21 December 2001
    ...excepted or not) but it is not justifiable as a necessary part of the safe and lawful execution of the loading or unloading process (cf. Houlder v Weir [1905] 2 KB 267– shifting ballast) and it has the effect of causing the vessel not to be at the disposition of the charterer, demurrage st......
  • Gebr. Broere B.v v Saras Chimica S.p.A.
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • Invalid date
  • Love & Stewart Ltd v Rowtor Steamship Company Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session
    • 7 December 1915
    ...S. C. 866; Yeoman v. RexELR, [1904] 2 K. B. 429; Branckelow Steamship Co. v. Lamport & HoltELR, [1897] 1 Q. B. 570; Houlder v. WeirELR, [1905] 2 K. B. 267; Commercial Steamship Co. v. BoultonELR, (1875) L. R., 10 Q. B. 346; Hough v. Athya & SonSC, (1879) 6 R. 2 The ‘Katy,’ [1895] P. 56. 3 G......
  • Nelson and Sons Ltd v Nelson Line, Liverpool, Ltd; and Re Arbitration Between the Same
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 25 June 1907
    ...L. T. Rep. 709; (1895) P. 56 ; The Moorcock, 6 Asp. Mar. Law Cm. 357, 373 (1888); 60 L. T. Rep. 655; 14 P. Div. 64; Houlder v. Weir, 10 Asp. Mar. Law Cas. 81 (1905); 32 L. T. Rap. 861 ; (1905) 2 K. B. 267 ; Whittall and Co. v. Rahtken's Shipping Company Limited, 10 Asp. Mar. Law Can. 471 (1......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT