Howkins & Harrison (A Firm) v Tyler and Another
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 2001 |
| Date | 2001 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
Mark Stephen Hotchin v The New Zealand Guardian Trust Company Ltd
... [2002] UKHL 14, [2002] 1 WLR 1397 at [6] per Lord Bingham. 180 See the judgment of Scott VC in Howkins & Harrison v Tyler [2001] Lloyd's Rep PN 1 (CA) at [17] and Longmore LJ's further explanation in Eastgate Group Ltd v Lindsey Morden Group Inc [2001] EWCA Civ 1446, [2002] 1 WLR 642 a......
-
Hurstwood Developments Ltd v Motor and General & Andersley & Company Insurance Services Ltd
...requisite insurance. Reliance is placed on the "simple test" propounded by Sir Richard Scott, V.C., in the Court of Appeal case of Howkins and Harrison v Tyler [2001] Lloyds LR: Prof. Neg. 1, at para. 17, namely would payment by either of the parties relieve the other pro tanto of its oblig......
-
Royal Brompton Hospital NHS Trust v Hammond (No. 3)
...glosses, extensive or restrictive, are warranted. The natural and ordinary meaning of "the same damage" is controlling. 28 In Howkins & Harrison v Tyler (a firm) [2001] Lloyd's Rep PN 1, at p 4, para 17 of his judgment, Sir Richard Scott V-C (now Lord Scott of Foscote) suggested a test to b......
-
Eastgate Group Ltd v Lindsey Morden Group Inc. (Smith & Williamson (A Firm), Part 20 defendant)
...from damage caused by negligence or breach of duty on the part of eg a valuer or an accountant, see Howkins & Harrison v. Tyler [2001] Lloyds Rep PN 1. Another result of the wording of the Act is that the defendant and the potential contributor must be liable to the same person, otherwise ......
Request a trial to view additional results