Hulse v Hulse
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1865 |
| Year | 1865 |
| Court | Court of Probate |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
So Youn Kim v Anthony Thomas Morris
...that the marriage subsists until decree absolute is obviously correct: it is based on a long line of authority: see in particular Hulse v Hulse and Tavernor (1871) LR 2 P & D 259, which was cited with approval in Fender v Mildmay [1936] KB 111 (where the majority disagreed that after decree......
-
S v S (Rescission of Decree Nisi: Pension Sharing Provision)
...3 All ER 588, [1955] 3 WLR 840. Densley v Densley (1964) 108 Sol Jo 159. Griffiths v Griffiths (1912) 106 LT 646. Hulse v Hulse (1871) LR 2 P & D 259. Jeffrey v Jeffrey [1951] P O v O (jurisdiction: Jewish divorce) [2000] 2 FLR 147. Rutter v Rutter (No 2) [1921] P 421. Savage v Savage [1982......
-
W v H
...[1938] AC 1, HL. H v H (rescission of decree nisi: pension sharing provision)[2002] EWHC 767 (Fam), [2002] 2 FLR 116. Hulse v Hulse (1871) LR 2 P & D 259. Moore v Moore [1892] P 382, [1891–4] All ER Rep Newman v Newman, McLean v McLean, Jones v Jones (Queen's Proctor intervening) [1984] FLR......