Hungerford v Havill; Devant

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date01 January 1662
Date01 January 1662
CourtCourt of the King's Bench

English Reports Citation: 82 E.R. 291

King's Bench Division

Hungerford
and
Havill
Devant

hungerford versus havill; devant. Hungerford port un action sur le case sur assumpsit versus un Havil. Plaintiff declare, que il fuit seiae del manner de Willinson in comitatu Gloucester, & diens le dit mannor est tiel custome, que sur chescun alienation fait p ascun frank-tenant, que tenit le frank-tenement del dit mannor, un relief eat done, & aprea 30 M. 13 Jac. uu S. T. fuit seise de tiel terre, & tenit c de c mannor, come del mannor de Winaon, en frank-soccage, (scilicet) per fealty, & auit del court 5s. Rent, & relief, quando acciderit accordant al cuatome del mannor. Et apres il monatre, q, S. T. ad alien c al John Havil, & ses heires, & que John H. fuit seise, & issint seiae 20 Jac. fait son darrein volunt, & per c devise ceo terre al defendant, & ses heires, & monstre le mort del deviser, & devisee enter, & q^ la est 5s. due pur primer alienation, & 5s. pur le second, & 51. arrearages del rent. Et aprea monstre, q, il eateat aignior del dit mannor, 3 July, 20 Jacob, la fuit un apeech inter le plaintiff, & defendant, pur les arrerages del rent, & pur les reliefs; & la le defendant en consideration, que le plaintiff voet absteyne dea suits tanq, le prochein court d'estre tenus pur le dit mannor, & que le _ j^q 292 HUNGEBFORD V. HAVILL LATCH, 98. plaintiff voet faire c appear a luy, & les auters tenants, queux fuer chargable ove, &c. & que le dits reliefs fuere due; defendant promise, & super luy assumpsit, a payer les dits reliefs, & arrerages. Le plaintiff averre, que le prochein court fuit tenus tiel jour, & le plaintiff la adonque fait c appeare, d'estre due al, &c. (soil.) per le homage, & fuit present p lour serement, que le rent fuit arreare, & il fait c appeare, que ceux reliefs fuere due per le monstrans des court-rolls al eux, & monstre, que defendant n'ad pay accordant son promise les, &c. Le defendant confest 1'action, & judgement done sur cest, & un breve d'enquiry del dammages agard sur cest, & un second judgement sur cest est d'estre done. Mes en arrest de judgement divers exceptions fuere pris. primiereraent, est impossible, que le plaintiff doit aver un relief. Secondement, le alienation est un novel forme de alienation, & ne poet estre piece al custome, quia vient per le sta-[95]-tute 32 & 34 H. 8. mes un alienation p volunt est diens le custome, & fuit compare al common recovery, ou ascun novel forme de alienation, come p fait indent; &amp...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Beavan v The Earl of Oxford
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Chancery
    • 29 January 1856
    ...The analogous provisions in the Irish Act 9 Geo. 4, c. 35, have received the interpretation now contended for, Hickson v. Collia (1 Jones & Lat. 94 and S. C. on rehearing 10 Ir. Eq. Rep. 447). The case of Freer v. Hesse (4 De. G. Mac. & G. 495), does not apply, and the decision in Shaw v. N......
  • George Shaw, - Appellant; James Neale and Frederick William Remnant, - Respondents
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 16 March 1858
    ...duly revived and re-docketed within twenty years before the conveyance to the purchaser. It is true that in Hickson v. Gollis (1 Jo', and Lat. 94) Lord Chancellor Sugden differed in some degree from Lord Plunkett, and took a view of the statute favourable to the other side, but the circumst......
  • Carroll v Darcy
    • Ireland
    • Court of Chancery (Ireland)
    • 29 April 1847
    ...CARROLL and DARCY. Berrington v. Evans Yo. & Col. Exch. 434. Hickson v. CollisUNKENR 6 Ir. Eq. Rep. 524; S. C. 1 Jo. & Lat. 94. Sterndale v. HanksonUNK 3 Ir. Eq. Rep. 390. Vincent v. Wellington long. & Tow. 456. St. John v. BoughtonENR 9 Sim. 219. Geraghty v. Abbott 8 Ir. Law. Rep. 60. Blak......
  • Walcott v Condon
    • Ireland
    • High Court of Chancery (Ireland)
    • 28 April 1853
    ...Drew v. Lord NorburyENR 3 Jo.l & Lat. 267. Blake v. D'ArcyENR S. & Sc. 493. Knox v. Kelly 1 Dra. & Wal. 542. Hickson v. CollisENRUNK 1 Jo. & Lat. 94; S. C. 6 Ir. Eq. Rep. 524. Geraghty v. Abbott 8 Ir. Law Rep. 60. Colyer v. Marnell 10 Ir. Law Rep. 353. Barrett v. Merrick 2 Jones, Exch. Rep.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Environment versus Investment: The Bolivian Mining Industry
    • United States
    • Journal of Environment & Development, The No. 4-1, January 1995
    • 1 January 1995
    ...1994, p. 31). Referring to the rural conditionsin Bolivia, the United Nations’ Report says 97% of the Bolivian peasants are poor. (FBIS-LAT-94-163, August 1994, p. 28) In this context of generalized poverty, small miners andcooperatives account for between 25,000 and 40,000, while in the Bo......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT