Hunter v Darngavil Coal Company

JurisdictionScotland
Judgment Date23 October 1900
Date23 October 1900
Docket NumberNo. 4.
CourtCourt of Session
Court of Session
2d Division

Lord Kincairney, Lord Justice-Clerk, Lord Trayner, Lord Moncreiff.

No. 4.
Hunter
and
Darngavil Coal Co.

Process—Proof—Separate proof as to preliminary defence—Reparation—Master and Servant—Personal Objection—Election—Workmen's Compensation Act, 1897 (60 and 61 Vict. cap. 37).—

In an action raised by a workman against his employers at common law for damages for injuries alleged to have been received through their fault, the defenders, besides denying fault, averred that the pursuer had given written notice that he claimed compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act, and that subsequently they had paid him compensation, and pleaded that in respect thereof the pursuer was barred from suing the action. In answer, the pursuer averred that he was induced to sign the notice shortly after the accident by false representations on the part of the defenders, at a time when, through illness, he could not and did not understand its import.

The Lord Ordinary (Kincairney) ordered issues for the trial of the whole case, including the question whether the pursuer had elected to take compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act.

Held (rev. this judgment) that this question should be determined by proof primo loco.

InApril 1900 William Hunter, miner, brought an action in the Court of Session against the Darngavil Coal Company, Limited, for damages at common law on account of injuries sustained by him on 31st January 1900 when in the defenders' employment.

The defenders, in their answers to the pursuer's condescendence, denied fault, and in a separate statement of facts they further averred;—(Stat. 1) ‘Upon 15th February 1899 the pursuer sent to the defenders a notice signed by him in these terms:—“I hereby give notice that, on the 31st day of January 1899, I was injured in the course of my employment in your West Longrigg Colliery through winding-rope slipping off drum, and that I claim compensation therefor under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1897.”’ (Stat. 2) ‘Following upon said notice, the defenders adjusted with the pursuer the average wage which he was earning prior to the accident to be £1, 13s. per week, and that the compensation payable to him was therefore 16s. 6d. per week. The defenders have paid compensation to the pursuer at this rate during 33 weeks after the first fortnight, the amount so paid being £27, 4s. 6d.’

The defenders produced receipts for the said payments, signed principally by the pursuer, and in...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • R v Thomas Alexander Haigh
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 31 October 2013
    ...of treating the case of each defendant separately. Mr Elvidge pointed to three passages in the summing-up in particular, at pages 3F, 10B and 68F to 69G. Mr Elvidge submitted that the judge should have given a direction that made sure the jury would consider the possibility that they might ......
  • R.L.G. v. R.G.G., 2006 BCSC 1299
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 17 January 2006
    ...The error in this regard was not in the evidence, but in the calculation of the ratio between the parties' incomes (Reasons at paras. 3(f), 10(e), 11(i) and 75 (e). 7. The Reasons expressly consider the Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines calculations prepared by each party, with the correc......
  • Re A Wall Signboard Attached At 3/F-10/f, China Travel (Cargo) Logistics Centre, No.1 Cheong Tung Road, Hung Hom, Kowloon Location 2: External Wall Facing Hung Hom Station
    • Hong Kong
    • District Court (Hong Kong)
    • 6 March 2017
    ...RE A WALL SIGNBOARD ATTACHED AT 3/F-10/F, CHINA TRAVEL (CARGO) LOGISTICS CENTRE, NO.1 CHEONG TUNG ROAD, HUNG HOM, KOWLOON LOCATION 2: EXTERNAL WALL FACING HUNG HOM STATION DCMP 545/2017 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO 545 OF ......
4 firm's commentaries
  • UK Financial Regulatory Developments - April 2016 #6
    • United Kingdom
    • JD Supra United Kingdom
    • 8 April 2016
    ...'0' , handler: '//fbapps.jdsupra.com/statistics/pixel?partnerID=dc4a1c64-176f-4a9f-913d-afd8f74f746f&file_unique_id=73fcee9f-2f97-4c71-892c-3f10a483eab3&profile_id=12833&type=5&' // Public , pageview: function (data) { if (data === undefined) { data = this._curpage(); } else if (typeof (dat......
  • IRS Releases Guidance on the Forbearances and Modifications of Mortgages Resulting from the COVID-19 Pandemic
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • 21 April 2020
    ...= { // Properties version: '0' , handler: '//fbapps.jdsupra.com/statistics/pixel?partnerID=dc4a1c64-176f-4a9f-913d-afd8f74f746f&file_unique_id=3f10b528-4cb7-4d36-8b37-48e4524e9681&profile_id=15231&type=5&' // Public , pageview: function (data) { if (data === undefined) { data = this._curpag......
  • IRS Issues Proposed Regulations That Would Recast Certain Debt Instruments as Equity
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • 18 May 2016
    ...considered in Estate of Mixon v. United States, 464 F.2d 394 (5th Cir. 1972). 44 Prop. Reg. § 1.385-3(b)(3)(ii). 45 Prop. Reg. § 1.385-3(f)(10). 12 exist to the extent debt is issued by the funded member during the period beginning 36 months before the date of the distribution or acquisitio......
  • IRS Issues Proposed Regulations That Would Recast Certain Debt Instruments as Equity
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • 29 April 2016
    ...considered in Estate of Mixon v. United States, 464 F.2d 394 (5th Cir. 1972). 44 Prop. Reg. § 1.385-3(b)(3)(ii). 45 Prop. Reg. § 1.385-3(f)(10). 46 Prop. Reg. § 1.385-3(b)(3)(iv)(B)(1). Importantly, the per se rule does not act as a safe harbor. Debt that is issued outside of the applicable......
11 books & journal articles
  • Index
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Texas Employment Law. Volume 2 - 2016 Part VIII. Selected Litigation Issues
    • 27 July 2016
    ...agreements as, §14:3.D Advantages and disadvantages of written contracts, §2:2.C Arbitration, §§2:3.B.2, 2:3.F.7 Attorneys’ fees, §2:3.F.10 Choice of forum, §2:3.F.2 Choice of law, §2:3.F.1 Compensation Arbitration provision, §2:3.B.2.d Base wage, §2:3.B.1 Employee benefits, §2:3.B.3 Negoti......
  • Index
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Texas Employment Law. Volume 2 - 2014 Part VIII. Selected litigation issues
    • 16 August 2014
    ...agreements as, §14:3.D Advantages and disadvantages of written contracts, §2:2.C Arbitration, §§2:3.B.2, 2:3.F.7 Attorneys’ fees, §2:3.F.10 Choice of forum, §2:3.F.2 Choice of law, §2:3.F.1 Compensation Arbitration provision, §2:3.B.2.d Base wage, §2:3.B.1 Employee benefits, §2:3.B.3 Negoti......
  • Index
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Texas Employment Law. Volume 1 Part VIII. Selected litigation issues
    • 5 May 2018
    ...agreements as, §14:3.D Advantages and disadvantages of written contracts, §2:2.C Arbitration, §§2:3.B.2, 2:3.F.7 Attorneys’ fees, §2:3.F.10 Choice of forum, §2:3.F.2 Choice of law, §2:3.F.1 Compensation Arbitration provision, §2:3.B.2.d Base wage, §2:3.B.1 Employee benefits, §2:3.B.3 Negoti......
  • Un règime communautaire de la concurrence partiellement dèrogatoire : l'article 86 § 2 CE
    • European Union
    • La nouvelle régulation des services publics en Europe Le renouvellement matériel du service public par le Droit communautaire
    • 22 May 2000
    ...d'une réglementation étatique - entendue au sens large, du moment qu'elle en a « l'apparence » 878 - par la lecture combinée des articles 3f, 10 et 81 du traité CE apparaît donc correspondre à des situations exception- nelles, la Cour privilégiant le fondement des articles 28 ou 49 du trait......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
20 provisions
  • The National Health Service Superannuation Scheme (2008 Section) (Scotland) Regulations 2013
    • United Kingdom
    • Scotland
    • 1 January 2013
    ...or not the member has reached 45 years of pensionable service for the purposes of regulation 3.A.3 (meaning of “pensionable service”).S-3.F.10 Acceptance of transfer value paymentsAcceptance of transfer value 3.F.10.—(1) If an application is duly made by a member under regulation 3.F.8 (rig......
  • Statutory Maternity Pay (General) Regulations 1986
    • United Kingdom
    • UK Non-devolved
    • 1 January 1986
    ...effect in accordance with art. 1(4) of the amending S.I.) by The Social Security Benefits Up-rating Order 2022 (S.I. 2022/292), arts. 1(3)(f), 10 Liability of Secretary of State to pay Statutory Maternity (1) Where— (a) an adjudicating authority has determined that an employer is liable to ......
  • Import Duties (General) (No. 10) Order 1976
    • United Kingdom
    • UK Non-devolved
    • 1 January 1976
    ...D.II.a)1. F 10·4% plus M,D £0·5905 per C1 10·4% £0·5905 100 kg per 100 kg 2. F 10·4% plus M,D £0·3936 per C1 10·4% £0·3936 100 kg per 100 kg 3. F 10·4% plus M,D £0·3149 per C1 £0·3149 100 kg per 100 kg 4. F 10·4% plus M,D £0·1968 per C1 10·4% £0·1968 100 kg per 100 kg b)1. F 10·4% plus M,D ......
  • The National Health Service (Superannuation Scheme, Pension Scheme and Injury Benefits) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2009
    • United Kingdom
    • Scotland
    • 1 January 2009
    ...corresponding to the 1995 scheme and transfers from such schemes to the 2008 scheme. Regulations 42 and 74 amend regulations 2.F.10 and 3.F.10 respectively on how 1995 scheme service and 2008 scheme service count towards the 45 years maximum service limit. Regulations 43 and 75 amend regula......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT