Hunter v Emmanuel

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date25 November 1854
Date25 November 1854
CourtCourt of Common Pleas

English Reports Citation: 139 E.R. 434

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS AND IN THE EXCHEQUER CHAMBER

Hunter
and
Emmanuel

hunter v. emmanuel. Nov. 25, 1854. Upon a trial by the record, the court amended the declaration by inserting therein the true amount recovered by the judgment, under the 15 & 16 Viet. c. 76, s. 222. The declaration in an action upon a judgment recovered in this court, stated the plaintiff to have recovered against the defendant 1181. Upon an issue on nul tie! record, the record being produced, it appeared that the sum recovered by the judgment declared on was 1171. only. Quain, on moving for judgment, also prayed leave to amend the declaration, by inserting therein the correct amount. He referred to the Common Law Procedure Act, 15 & 16 Viet. c. 76, and to the case of Noble v. Chapman, ante, vol. xiv., p. 400...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Gordon v Hassard
    • Ireland
    • Court of Common Pleas (Ireland)
    • 10 May 1859
    ...sup. Regina v. NaghtenUNK 9 Ir. Eq. Rep. 593. Phillips v. ShawENR 4 B. & Ald. 435. Noble v. ChapmanENR 14 C. B. 400. Hunter v. EmanuelENR 15 C. B. 290. Buckland v. Johnson 23 Law Jour., C. P., 207. COMMON LAW REPORTS. 195 trial, the point now raised was not the subject of discussion. It was......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT