Imperial Bank v London and St. Katharine Docks Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1876 |
| Year | 1876 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Bofinger v Kingsway Group Ltd
...Kirkwood's Estate (1878) 1 LR Ir 108. [See also Aylwin v Witty (1861) 30 LJ Ch 860.] 16Imperial Bank v London and St Katharine Docks Co (1877) 5 Ch D 195. 17 (1863) 32 Beav 499 at 505–506 [ 55 ER 196 at 198]. See also In re Davison's Estate (1893) 31 LR Ir 249 at 25 5. 18 (1858) 25 Beav 31......
-
Edward Dohertt v Frederick H. Kennedy, William Findlater, and The Dublin City Distillery Company, Ltd
... ... of which, amounting to £2000, was secured to the bank by the joint and several guarantee of the plaintiff (who ... In Imperial Bank v. London & St. Katherine's Docks Company ( 4 ), ... ...
-
Fisher v Provincial Bank of Ireland
...or at a fixed or determinate future time, a sum certain in money to, or to the order of, a specified person, or to bearer. (1) L. R. 5 Ch. D. 195, at p. 200. (2) [1914] P. 274. (3) 5 Q. B. 199. (4) [1906] 1 K. B. 318; [1907] 1 K. B. 246; [1908] A. C. 92. (1) 20 Q. B. D. 645; 21 Q. B. D. 352......
-
Orkin Lingerie Co (Pty), Ltd v Melamed & Hurwitz
...between himself and the person primarily liable, is a surety (per JESSEL, M.R., in Imperial Bank v London & St. Katherine Docks Co., (1877) 5 Ch. D. 195 at p. 200) . . . whether one is a surety, therefore, depends Trollip J on his relation to the creditor but on his relation to the principa......
Request a trial to view additional results