Imperial Loan Company v Stone

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1892
Year1892
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
70 cases
  • Joanne Dunhill (A Protected Party by her Litigation Friend, Paul Tasker) v Shaun Burgin (No 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 9 Noviembre 2012
    ...for the January 2003 compromise to be approved; and the settlement could therefore not be reopened. 9 I will call this argument the Imperial Loan point: it derives from the decision of the Court of Appeal in The Imperial Loan Company Ltd v Stone [1892] 1 QB 599 which, as the headnote recor......
  • Dunhill v Burgin
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 12 Marzo 2014
    ...other party to the contract knew or ought to have known that she lacked that capacity in which case it is voidable (the rule in Imperial Loan Co Ltd v Stone [1892] 1 QB 2 These issues are of very considerable importance, particularly in personal injury cases. On the one hand, there is the ......
  • Che Som bte Yip and Others v Maha Pte Ltd and Others (Maha Re Ltd and Another, Third parties)
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 Enero 1989
  • Che Som bte Yip and Another v Maha Pte Ltd and Another
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 30 Junio 1989
    ...be a strange thing if a Court of Equity in dealing with contracts were to deal on any different principle.In lmperial Loan Co v Stone [1892] 1 QB 599, Lord Esher MR at p 601 said that a lunatic (now such a person is known as `mentally disordered`) can only set aside a contract entered into ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • The Legal Status and Enforceability of Mediated Settlement Agreements
    • Ireland
    • Hibernian Law Journal No. 12-2013, January 2013
    • 1 Enero 2013
    ...discussion on unconscionability in respect of Irish law generally, see McDermott, supra note 16, pp.748–760 93 Imperial Loan Co v Stone [1892] 1 QB 599. See also McDermott, supra note 16, pp.907–911 94 See Sussman, supra note 12, p.34 01 Feehily 2.indd 13 11/06/2013 10:24 14 RONÁN FEEHILY t......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT