Improving Access to Environmental Justice under the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights: The Roles of NGOs in Nigeria

Pages63-79
AuthorEghosa O. Ekhator
Date01 February 2014
DOI10.3366/ajicl.2014.0080
Published date01 February 2014
INTRODUCTION

Nigeria is a signatory to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (‘African Charter’). The African Charter was domesticated into Nigerian law via the instrumentality of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (Enforcement and Ratification) Act 1983.1

Formerly Cap 10 LFN 1990 now Cap A9, LFN 2004 (African Charter Act).

The abundance of case law in Nigeria on the African Charter suggests that the domestication of the charter has broadened the domestic enforcement rights. Accordingly, the charter has both international and human rights ramifications for environmental justice in Nigeria

Despite the importance of the charter to human rights enforcement, environmental justice is still very much a pipe dream in Nigeria. The reasons for this conundrum include the weak regulatory regime in the oil and gas industry, the lack of political will by regulatory agencies to enforce oil and gas laws and regulations, the endemic corruption and judicial obstacles amongst others.

This paper will focus on the various strategies used by non-governmental organisations (NGOs) to improve access to environmental justice by stakeholders via the instrumentality of the African Charter. Furthermore, it will provide a critique of the oil and gas industry in Nigeria where environmental injustice or degradation arising mainly from the activities of the oil multinational corporations (oil MNCs) are localised.

Notwithstanding the institutional barriers to environmental justice in Nigeria, NGOs have utilised the provisions of the African Charter to improve access to environmental justice for victims of the activities of the oil and gas multinational corporations (oil MNCs) operating in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria.

This paper is divided into six sections. The first section is the introductory section. The second section traces the history of the environmental justice paradigm from the United States of America. The third section focuses on the oil and gas industry in Nigeria and the various laws that accentuate environmental injustice in the oil and gas industry. The fourth section focuses on the status of the African Charter in Nigeria. The fifth section focuses on litigation and other strategies used by NGOs in Nigeria to address environmental injustice in Nigeria. In conclusion, this paper highlights the challenges that NGOs may face in the future to access environmental justice before the African Court of Justice and Human Rights.

OVERVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE PARADIGM

Environmental justice is a new paradigm for achieving a healthy and sustainable environment or communities and it is a culmination of more than 500 years of struggle by people of colour in the USA.2

C. Lee, ‘Developing the Vision of Environmental Justice: A Paradigm for Achieving Healthy and Sustainable Communities’, 14 Virginia Environmental Law Journal (1994–5): 571–8.

The environmental justice paradigm was a fundamental departure from the prevailing idea of environmentalism which appeared to favour the protection and sustainability of ecology whilst neglecting humanity. According to Obiora, ‘many faulted mainstream environmentalism for indulging the idiosyncrasies of the affluent instead of exposing inequity and injustice’.3

A. Obiora, ‘Symbolic Episodes in the Quest for Environmental Justice’, Human Rights Quarterly (1991): 465.

Flowing from this premise, environmental justice emerged as a counter measure to the discontent and inherent racism entrenched in government policies in the Deep South of the USA in the 1960s and 1970s.4

O. W. Pedersen, ‘Environmental Justice in the UK: Uncertainty, Ambiguity and the Law’, Legal Studies (2010): 1–26.

After the successful civil rights movement by African Americans in the 1960s, their attention was turned to environmental problems plaguing the black communities. For example, environmental justice served as a buffer to the indiscriminate and deliberate siting of hazardous and dangerous (noxious) wastes in the areas predominately inhabited by ethnic minorities in the USA.5

See Lee, supra note 2; R. T. Ako, ‘Nigeria's Land Use Act: An Anti-thesis to Environmental Justice’, 53(2) Journal of African Law (2009): 289–304, at 292.

Poor environmental practices were said to be discriminatory on the poor and black communities and this led to a number of studies6

These studies include General Accounting Office, Siting of Hazardous Waste Landfills and their Correlation with Racial and Economic Status of Surrounding Communities, GAO/RCED-83-168 (1983); Commission for Racial Justice, United Church of Christ and Public Data Access, Inc., Toxic Waste and Race in United States: A National Report on the Racial and Socio-Economic Characteristics of Communities with Hazardous Waste Sites, Public Data Access (1987); United Church of Christ Justice and Witness Ministries, Toxic Wastes and Race at Twenty 1987–2007, United Church of Christ Justice and Witness Ministries (2007).

which indicated that there was link between the ‘minority and environmental harms’.7

Pedersen, supra note 4.

The environmental justice doctrine has flourished and it has spread to all corners of the world, especially areas with a history of environmental abuse or degradation. Countries to which the doctrine has diffused include Nigeria, South Africa and India, amongst others. Thus, it can be argued that the environmental justice paradigm is now a global movement which is no longer localised to the experiences of the ethnic minorities in the USA.

The next part of the paper will focus on the contextual basis of environmental justice.

DEFINING ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE

The significance of the doctrine varies depending on the context or the country in focus. For example, ‘environmental justice in Africa emphasizes access to natural resources, while in the USA and UK the focus is on maintaining the planet's well-being via active public participation’.8

Ako, supra note 5, at 292.

Thus in the African (or Nigerian) context, a distinct connotation of environmental justice will suffice. Here, access or control and ownership of natural resources by the inhabitants of the Niger Delta region (where the oil and gas industry is located) are the underlying factors in the environmental justice paradigm in Nigeria

In the African or developing country context, in which access to resources is paramount, Obiora defines environmental justice as ‘the equitable distribution of environmental amenities, the rectification and retribution of environmental abuses, the restoration of nature, and the fair exchange of resources’.9

Obiora, supra note 3, at 477.

Also flowing from this premise, Adeola defines environmental justice as ‘any undue imposition of environmental burdens on innocent bystanders or communities not parties to the activities generating such burdens’.10

F. O. Adeola, ‘Cross-national Environmental Injustice and Human Rights Issues: A Review of Evidence from the Developing World’, 43 American Behavioral Scientist (2000): 686–706, at 688.

In essence, environmental justice is premised on right to a healthy and safe environment; an equitable share or allocation of natural resources; the right not to suffer disproportionately from environmental policies, regulations and laws; and reasonable access to environmental information coalesced with participation and environmental decision making.11

Scottish Parliament, available at http://scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2006/05/23091323/12 (accessed 10 October 2013). Generally see International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, article 3, which states: ‘the State Parties to the present Convention undertake to ensure the equal right of men and women to the enjoyment of all economic, social and cultural rights set forth in the present Convention’.

Furthermore, environmental justice is akin to environmental rights; the concept of environmental rights has attained some level of international recognition and there is an international recognition of the concept of environmental rights.12

O. Odigie, ‘Environmental Justice and Poverty Alleviation: Roadmap to Sustainable Development in Nigeria’, 1 NIALS Journal of Law and Public Policy (2012): 152–82, also available at http://www.nials-nigeria.org/journals/Omoyemen%20Lucia%20Odigielawp.pdf (accessed 12 November 2013).

The African Charter and the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (CFRN) 1999 are no exceptions in promoting or recognising environmental rights. A major innovation of the 1999 constitution is that it was the first constitution in Nigeria to expressly provide for the protection of the environment.13

O. Fagbohun, ‘Reappraising the Nigerian Constitution for Environmental Management’, 1(1) Ambrose Alli University Law Journal (2002): 24–47.

Section 20 of the constitution 1999 states that ‘the state shall protect and improve the environment and safeguard the water, air, land, forest and wildlife of Nigeria’. This section of the constitution has been the subject of numerous criticisms, a major one being that it does not provide or contain provisions for the right to a clean or healthy environment.14

R. T. Ako, ‘The Judicial Recognition and Enforcement of the Right to Environment: Differing Perspectives from Nigeria and India’, 3 National University of Juridical Sciences Law Review (2010): 423–45.

The section has also been criticised on such other grounds as the wording being very broad; also that the provision ‘falls under chapter II of the Constitution, which is non-justiciable’.15

G. Ogbodo, ‘Environmental Protection in Nigeria: Two Decades after the Koko Incident’, 15(1) Annual Survey of International and Comparative Law (2009): 1–18.

Non-justiciability robs the provisions of judicial enforceability

The gamut of economic, cultural and social (socio-economic) rights16

Ebobrah defines socio-cultural rights as ‘the body of human rights that are essential for the promotion of conditions necessary for the advancement of economic...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT