In Camera Stellata

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date01 January 1792
Date01 January 1792
CourtCourt of the King's Bench

English Reports Citation: 80 E.R. 634

COURT OF WARDS, AND OTHER COURTS AT WESTMINSTER

In Camera Stellata

mich. 18 jacobi. in camera stellata. Robert Heath an attorny, and clark of the Kings-Bench, exhibited his bill against Jonathan Bret and five other defendants for perjury in the five, and subornation in Jonathan Bret himself : the case was this, Francis Bret deviseth his landa, and dyes withont issue; Jonathan Bret, being his brother and heir, pretends the devise to be revoked, and enters in part of the land devised : and in trespass brought against him, and tryecl at the Bar of the Common Bench, the question was, if the devise were revoked or not? And to prevent the pretended revocation, the plaintiff produced many witnesses, which deposed to that point; and he also produced the now plaintiff in this suit, which testified, that Jonathan Brett came to him the Fryday being the seventeenth of October, 15 Jacobi, and said to him, that Francis Brett was come to London, and in his journey conceived that he had seen some apparitions, and that he came to London the same day, and some other collaterall matters: and the jury upon all the evidence gave verdict for the plaintiff in the same action ; after which, Jonathan Brett reported and published, that Heath was perjured, for which Heath brought his action in the King's Bench against Jonathan Bret, who justifies, that Heath deposed wickedly in the Common Bench, that Francis Bret was bound in his LEV,67. SIR JOHN BINGLEYS CASE 635 bed, and distract of his wits [67] three...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Risk Management Partners Ltd v Brent London Borough Council (No 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 16 May 2008
    ...from the Autonomous Communities as regards which Tragsa must be regarded as a third party. 60 It appears to follow from Article 88(4) of Ley 66/1997 and Articles 3(2) to (6) and 4(1) and (7) of Royal Decree 371/1999 that Tragsa is required to carry out the orders given it by the public auth......
  • Sir Thomas Stradling, Knight, Plaintiff, against Rowland Morgan, Defendant
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Common Pleas
    • 1 January 1816
    ...in the Chancery by original writ of debt, for that is within the words, (c) T. 11 H. 7. 26. pi. 9. Bro. Quo minus 10. H. 8 H. 5. Fitz. Ley 66. 2 lust. 551. 4 Inst. 112. 2 Rol. R. 301. Crompt. J. C. 105. b. 139. a. And herewith agrees Britton, speaking of the Court of Exchequer, in these wor......
  • Weeden against Baldwin
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of the King's Bench
    • 1 January 1793
    ...10 Co. 81, 84. Plowd. 344. Mo. 148, 177, 341, 356, 734. 1 And. 34. Keilw. 209. Dyer 72. Aleyn 2, 55. Cro. El. 100. 1 Leon. 76. 2 Leon. 35. Ley. 66. Noy. 117. 3 Leon. 79, 29. 2 And. 21. Co. Litt. 78 a. Ill, 123. 1 Bulst. 165. Godb. 17. 1 Roll. Abr. 618. 1 Saund. 261. lu ejectment a special v......
4 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT