In the Estate of Meyer

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1908
Year1908
CourtProbate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 cases
  • Marley v Rawlings and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 3 February 2011
    ...Hunt (1875) LR 3 P&D 250 (in which two sisters had made similar, but not mirror, wills and each executed that of the other) and Re Meyer [1908] P 353 (in which two sisters made mirror codicils and again executed that of the other), and in both of which cases the disposition was held to be i......
  • Tob Weng Keong and Another v Tob Chee Hoong
    • Malaysia
    • Court of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Marley v Rawlings and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 2 February 2012
    ...authorities which are directly in point, In the Goods of Hunt (1875) LR 3 P&D 250 ( Re Hunt) and In the estate of Fanny Deborah Meyer [1908] P 353 ( Re Meyer) (and see also In the Goods of F.S (1850) 14 Jur.402) were unhelpful to the appellant's case, they were either wrongly decided and/or......
  • Marley v Rawlings (No 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 18 September 2014
    ...that Sir James Hannen P and Sir Gorell Barnes P took the same view in, respectively, In the Goods of Hunt (1875) LR 3 P&D 250, at 252, and In re Meyer [1908] P 353, 354. Further, as Jeune J pointed out in Boehm at 251, there is obvious "difficulty [in] rejecting words where their rejection......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill A Practitioner's Guide to Probate Disputes - 2nd edition Contents
    • 29 August 2022
    ...3 WLR 1015, [2014] 4 All ER 619, [2014] WTLR 1511 228 Marshall v Marshall [1998] EWCA Civ 1467, [1998] 10 WLUK 35 171 Meyer’s Estate, Re [1908] P 353, 77 LJP 150, 52 Sol Jo 716, 99 LT 881, PD&A 29, 64 Minns v Foster [2002] All ER (D) 225 (Dec), ChD 66 Mitchell and Mitchell v Gard and Kingwe......
  • Execution of a Will
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill A Practitioner's Guide to Probate Disputes - 2nd edition Contents
    • 29 August 2022
    ...signed envelope and the attested document together formed the will. 3.5 EXECUTION OF THE WRONG WILL It was established in Meyer’s Estate [1908] P 353 that if the testator/testatrix executed a will of another person by mistake as his/her own, it would not be valid and probate will be refused......
  • Knowledge and Approval
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill A Practitioner's Guide to Probate Disputes - 2nd edition Contents
    • 29 August 2022
    ...the contents of the paper as her will, for it is quite clear that if she had known of the contents she would not have signed it’. Re Meyer [1908] P 353, was a similar case where sisters signed each other’s wills by mistake. The will was challenged on two grounds. The first that it ‘must app......
  • Case Note
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2015, December 2015
    • 1 December 2015
    ...as alternatives. 18 See accompanying text at n 2 above. 19 c 53 (UK). 20In the Goods of Hunt(1875) LR 3 P & D 250; In the Estate of Meyer[1908] P 353. 21[1946] NZLR 614. 22 See Re Brander[1952] 4 DLR 688. The Canadian court purported to follow Guardian Trust & Executors Co of New Zealand Lt......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT