Ingram v Ingram

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtProbate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
Year1956
Date1956

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • Julius Roy v Audrey Jolly
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal (Jamaica)
    • 23 November 2012
    ...ER 129 [1967] 3 All ER 129, Hunter v Chief Constable of West Midlands et al [1981] 3 All ER 727 [1981] 3 All ER 727, Ingram v Ingram [1956] 1 All ER 785 [1956] 1 All ER 785 and R v D; R v J [1996] 1 All ER 881 [1996] 1 All ER 881. 11 Counsel further submitted that even if the court is not b......
  • Edwards v Edwards
    • United Kingdom
    • Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • Invalid date
    ...Hollington v. Hewthorn & Co. Ltd. [1943] K.B. 587; 59 T.L.R. 321; [1943] 2 All E.R. 35 applied. Ingram v. Ingram [1956] P. 390; [1956] 2 W.L.R. 782; [1956] 1 All E.R. 785 (4) That, in the circumstances of this case, the action of the wife's solicitors in requesting such voluminous copyi......
  • Ching Tong and Others; Chow Kay Kong
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Gollins v Gollins
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 26 October 1962
  • Get Started for Free