Injustice Caused by Restraint Order
| DOI | http://doi.org/10.1177/002201839906300621 |
| Published date | 01 December 1999 |
| Date | 01 December 1999 |
The
Journal
of
Criminal
Law
AppealOffice, as
the
Crown is
not
ordinarily represented where the
appeal is against sentence only.
Injustice Caused
by
Restraint
Order
In re
Andrews
[1999]1 WLR 1236
The appellant andhis son were arrested by excise officers andcharged
with
VAT
offences andlaterwith
PAVE
offences contrary to PartVIof the
Criminal Justice Act 1988. The excise authorities seized more
than
£42,000 from the house of the father (the present appellant) and later
obtained from the court arestraint order in relation
not
only to that
property
but
also to
the
property of the company which was owned by
the son
and
in which
both
the
accused worked. In the event of con-
viction or ona later application, that property could (and
it
might be
expected that it would) be the subject of a confiscation order.
An
application was
made
for the appointment of a receiver inrespectof all
the property, the reason being given that otherwise
the
son might
dissipate theassets. For that reason, areceiver was appointed, even in
relation to the property taken from the father's house, although no
allegation had been made as to his potential acts. The order was, how-
ever, made against
the
father. The terms of the receivership expressly
permitted the receiver to draw
her
expenses from
the
property which
she controlled on behalf of the court, although it was added that
if
the
property was insufficient to satisfy the claimfor expenses, any shortfall
would be
met
by the Commissioners of Customs
and
Excise.
It
was also
stated that
the
agreement of
the
Commissioners would be required for
such expenses
and
that
it was only on afailure to reach agreement that
the
question would be determined by
the
court.
In
the
event, although the son was convicted, the father was
acquitted on all
the
charges brought against
him
and
he was allowed his
costs
out
of central funds. The determining officer, however, held that
the costs were to be confined to those incurred in the Crown Court
proceedings, so
that
the
costs of the receivership were excluded from the
award made by the Crown Court on his acquittal of
the
criminal charges.
Out
of the £42,000 taken from him, the appellant had received £32,000
for
the
expenses of his criminal trial, so that the determining officer's
decision left
him
some £10,000
out
of pocket,as a result of the
receivership.
PartVI ofthe Criminal JusticeAct 1988.empowers
the
court to make
aconfiscation order in certain circumstances and,as ancillary thereto, it
may appoint areceiver for
any
property made the subject of arestraint
order,incase a confiscation order maybe appliedfor later.A receiver
thus appointed
under
s 77(8)oftheAct controls the property as an
officer of the court, so
that
indirectly it is the court (not the prosecutor'
who
seized the property) which has control. RSC Ord30r3 permits the
556
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting