Innospec Ltd and Others v 1) Mr J Walker 2) Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Interested Party)

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date2014
Neutral CitationUKEAT/0232/13
Date2014
CourtEmployment Appeal Tribunal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
10 cases
  • Dermod O'Brien v Ministry of Justice
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 6 October 2015
    ...the Employment Appeal Tribunal (Langstaff P, Mr A Harris and Mrs MV McArthur) reversed that decision. Their decision is at UKEAT/232/13, [2014] ICR 645. 4 In both cases the outcome of the appeal turns on principles of EU law and, in Mr Walker's case, on a provision of domestic legislation.......
  • British Gas Trading Ltd v 1) Mr ZJ Lock 2) Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Appeal Tribunal
    • 22 February 2016
    ...it is of some significance that Langstaff J was also the judge sitting in this Appeal Tribunal in the case of Innospec Ltd v Walker [2014] ICR 645. That case has since been decided by the Court of Appeal: see [2016] ICR 182, where it is reported alongside and under the name of O’Brien v Min......
  • Bear Scotland Ltd and Others v Mr David Fulton and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Appeal Tribunal
    • 4 November 2014
    ...approach would not be appropriate where there were practical consequences. An example was that in Innospec Ltd and Others v Walker [2014] ICR 645 the Appeal Tribunal recognised that to interpret legislation in line with the Directive would be to disturb deliberate policy choices and thus en......
  • British Gas Trading Ltd v Lock and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 7 October 2016
    ...that this means that a conforming interpretation will be possible in every case. He referred to the EAT's decision in Innospec Ltd and others v. Walker [2014] ICR 645 where Langstaff J, at para 53, said that 'what is necessary is seeing whether Parliament clearly adopted a legislative choi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT