Instance v Ccl Label Inc.
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 2002 |
| Date | 2002 |
| Court | Chancery Division (Patents Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 cases
-
Trek Technology (Singapore) Pte Ltd v FE Global Electronics Pte Ltd and Others and Other Suits (No 2)
...Lectra Systems Ltd [1995] RPC 383 (folld) Hill v Evans (1862) 4 De G F &J 288; 45 ER 1195; 31 LJ Ch 457 (folld) Instance v CCL Label Inc [2002] FSR 27 (folld) Mabbuchi Motor KK's Patents [1996] RPC 387 (folld) Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co v Bondina Ltd [1973] RPC 491 (folld) Morton-N......
-
Ship's Equipment Centre Bremen Gmb H v Fuji Trading (Singapore) Pte Ltd
...First Currency Choice Pte Ltd v Main-Line Corporate Holdings Ltd [2008] 1 SLR (R) 335; [2008] 1 SLR 335 (refd) Instance v CCL Label Inc [2002] FSR 27 (refd) Kimberly-Clark Worldwide Inc v Procter & Gamble Ltd [2000] FSR 235 (refd) Kirin-Amgen Inc v Hoechst Marion Roussel Ltd [2005] RPC 9 (r......
-
FE Global Electronics Pte Ltd and Others v Trek Technology (Singapore) Pte Ltd and Another Appeal
...General Tire & Rubber Company, The v The Firestone Tyre and Rubber Company Limited [1972] RPC 457 (folld) Instance v CCL Label Inc [2002] FSR 27 (refd) Kirin-Amgen Inc v Hoechst Marion Roussel Ltd [2005] RPC 9 (refd) Peng Lian Trading Co v Contour Optik Inc [2003] 2 SLR (R) 560; [2003] 2 SL......
-
Warner-Lambert Company LLC v Novartis (Singapore) Pte Ltd
...explanation for the delay. A period need not be long to be considered an undue delay. For example, in Instance v CCL Label Inc [2002] FSR 27, the court found that a delay of one year amounted to an undue delay as a period of two months, after receiving counsel’s advice, would have been suff......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Singapore Patent Office denial of post grant amendments in revocation hearing founded on undue delay and unfair advantage
...788 Patent and almost six months from the start of the Singapore revocation proceeding. The UK Patents Court in Instance v CCL Label Inc. [2002] FSR 27 (Instance) found that a delay of one year amounted to an undue delay, as a period of two months would be sufficient to formulate an amend......
1 books & journal articles
-
Intellectual Property Law
...taken in SKF is ‘a desire to ensure that patentees do not obtain an advantage which is unfair’: per Pumfrey J in Instance v CCL Label Inc[2002] FSR 27 at [37]. While this rationale was sound for patents granted under the UK Patents Act 1949 before the advent of claims, some reservations wer......