International Credit and Investment Company (Overseas) Ltd and Another v Adham and Others

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date12 March 1993
Date12 March 1993
CourtChancery Division

Chancery Division

Before Mr Justice Harman

International Credit and Investment Company (Overseas) Ltd and Another
and
Adham and Others

Company - ownership of shares- jurisdiction

Power to determine Pakistani issue

The court had jurisdiction to determine issues arising between a company incorporated under the Companies Acts and other non-resident parties, notwithstanding that its principal property and business was in Pakistan and the court had knowledge that a Pakistani advocate, purporting to be instructed by it, was denying such jurisdiction.

Mr Justice Harman so held in the Chancery Division when:

1 declaring, inter alia, that (a) Shaikh Kamal Adham, the first defendant, resident in Jedda; Faisal Saud Al Fulaij, the second defendant, resident in Kuwait, and Falcon Properties Ltd, the third defendant, resident in Nassau, held upon constructive trusts for Financial and Investment International Ltd (FIIL), the second plaintiff, resident in the Cayman Islands, shares registered in their respective names in the register of members of the fourth defendant, Attock Oil Company Ltd.

(b) nine named individuals had on October 29, 1992 validly been appointed as directors of Attock;

(c) on November 4 the articles of association of Attock had been validly amended;

(d) the maximum number of Attock's directors had been validly increased to 13 by an ordinary resolution passed on October 29; and

2 ordering that (a) the register of members of Attock, properly retained by it at its registered office in London in accordance with section 353 of the Companies Act 1985 be rectified pursuant to section 359 of that Act by recording FIIL as holding the entirety of its issued share capital and by making a number of specified deletions;

(b) the plaintiffs' costs of the trial of those issues be taxed forthwith and paid by Falcon, Ghaith Rashad Pharaon, the fifth defendant, resident in Jedda, Pharaoh Holdings Ltd, the sixth defendant, resident in Nassau, and Lhasa Investments Ltd, the seventh defendant, resident in the Cayman Islands.

By his Lordship's orders (a) of October 28, 1992 Mr Timothy Brown was appointed receiver of Attock's issued shares; (b) of November 10, 1992 certain issues were ordered for trial.

On March 11, 1993 an advocate practising in Rawalpindi, purporting to act on Attock's instructions, sent direct to his Lordship by fax a request for an adjournment on the grounds, inter alia, that:

(1) Attock had its registered principal office in Rawalpindi and was only...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Wing Hak Man and Another v Bio-Treat Technology Ltd and Others
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 29 d1 Setembro d1 2008
    ...Bio-Treat. (iii) Choice of Law 36 Mr Tan relied upon International Credit & Investment Co (Overseas) Ltd and Another v Adham and others [1994] 1 BCLC 66 for the proposition that where shares are concerned, the place in which the shares are situated will determine the applicable law. He argu......
  • Febvre Company Ltd v Grape Expectations SA
    • British Virgin Islands
    • High Court (British Virgin Islands)
    • 12 d1 Fevereiro d1 2007
    ...in Dicey & Morris 13 th Edn. that the fact that a defendant could not be sued as of right meant that the forum was not available. 10 [1994] 1 BCLC 66 11 [1992] BCLC 118 12 [1992] Ch. D. 72 13 See letter from Harneys 7 th June 2006—page 30 Ex. ‘SJS 1’ ...
  • Argentine Holdings v BA Hotel
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 24 d1 Março d1 1997
    ...Ltd. v. Mentor Ins. Co. (U.K.), [1990] 1 W.L.R. 153; [1989] 3 All E.R. 74. (11) International Credit & Inv. Co. (Overseas) Ltd. v. Adham, [1994] BCLC 66, dicta of Harman J. applied. (12) International Credit & Inv. Co. (Overseas) Ltd. v. Adham, 1996 CILR 89. (13) Kilderkin Invs. v. Player19......
  • Wing Hak Man and Another v Bio-Treat Technology Ltd and Others
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 29 d1 Setembro d1 2008
    ...Bio-Treat. (iii) Choice of Law 36 Mr Tan relied upon International Credit & Investment Co (Overseas) Ltd and Another v Adham and others [1994] 1 BCLC 66 for the proposition that where shares are concerned, the place in which the shares are situated will determine the applicable law. He argu......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT