Ionides v Pacific Insurance Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1865 |
| Court | Exchequer |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
HIH Casualty and General Insurance Ltd v New Hampshire Insurance Company
...law but it could be given in evidence wherever it was, though not valid, material… "This view was affirmed in the Exchequer Chamber (1873) L.R. 7 Q.B. 517. Kelly C.B. stated that the slip was admissible, for example to show that the policy had been procured by misrepresentation or by non-d......
-
Youell v Bland Welch & Company Ltd
...slip could be given in evidence for the purpose of showing that it was not. 97This view was affirmed in the Exchequer Chamber (1873) L.R. 7 Q.B. 517. Kelly C.B. stated that the slip was admissible, for example to show that the policy had been procured by misrepresentation or by non-disclos......
-
Commercial Union Assurance Company, Ltd, and Others v Niger Company, Ltd, et è Contra
...whatever she was, at a premium the amount of which was already finally fixed." 15This decision was affirmed in the Exchequer Chamber ( L.R.7, Q.B. 517). Kelly, C.B., in delivering the judgment, said the slip was admissible in evidence for a great variety of purposes, and amongst those for t......
-
George Kallis (Manufacturers) Ltd v Success Insurance Ltd And Another
...is concluded every material circumstance ... etc." Cory v. Patton 1872 L.R. 7 QB 304; Ionides v. Pacific Fire & Marine Insurance 1872 L.R. 7 QB 517 and Lishman v. Northern Maritime Insurance 1875 LR 10 CP 179 are all authority for the proposition that an assured need not communicate to the ......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
The Policy-Slip (Dis)connect
...Fennia Patria [1983] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 287. See also Ionides v. Pacific Fire and Marine Insurance Co (1871) LR 6 QB 674; affirmed on appeal (1872) LR 7 QB 517; Pindos Shipping Corporation v. Frederick Charles Raven (The “Mata Hari”) [1983] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 449. 3Bennett, HN, The Law of Marine Insu......
-
The continuing duty of utmost good faith
...la Cite SA (formerly Banque Keyser Ullman SA) v Westgate Insurance Ionides and Chapeaurouge v The Pacific Fire and Marine Insurance Co (1872) LR 7 QB 517; Cory & another v Patton (1874) LR 9 QB 577; Lishman v Northern Maritime Insurance Co (1875) LR 10 CP 179. Toulmin v Inglis (1808) 1 Camp......
-
The Marine Insurance Slip and HIH v New Hampshire
...that, whilst 1HIH Casualty & General Insurance v New Hampshire [2001] EWCA Civ 735 2(1867) LR 2 HL 296 3At p. 321 4(1871) LR 6 QB 674; LR 7 QB 517 5At 684-685 [2011] Southampton Student Law Review Vol 1(2) the slip is clearly a contract for marine insurance, [it] is equally clearly not a po......