Iron and Steel Holding and Realisation Agency v Compensation Appeal Tribunal
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Year | 1966 |
Date | 1966 |
Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
25 cases
- Mohamed Yasseen v Janki Persaud
-
British & Commonwealth Holdings Plc and and Others v British & Commonwealth Holdings Plc and and Others
...lender suffered as a result. The market fall cannot realistically be seen as a new intervening cause. In Iron and Steel Holding and Realisation Agency v Compensation Appeal Tribunal [1966] 1 W.L.R. 480 at 492 and Royscot Trust Limited v Rogerson [1991] 2 Q.B. 297 at 307 the foreseeability o......
-
Royscot Trust Ltd v Rogerson
...not break the chain of causation. As Winn L.J. said in Iron and Steel Holding andRealisation Agency v. Compensation Appeal Tribunal [1966] 1 W.L.R. 480, 492: "In my opinion, wherever any intervening factor was itself foreseen or reasonably foreseeable by the actor, the person responsible fo......
-
South Australia Asset Management Corpn v York Montague Ltd (also known as Banque Bruxelles Lambert S.A. v Eagle Star Insurance Company Ltd)
...lender suffered as a result. The market fall cannot realistically be seen as a new intervening cause. In Iron and Steel Holding and Realisation Agency v Compensation Appeal Tribunal [1966] 1 WLR 480 at 492 and Royscot Trust Limited v Rogerson [1991] 2 QB 297 at 307 the foreseeability of a......
Request a trial to view additional results