Islington London Borough Council v Al Alas, Wray and Al Alas-Wray (through her children's guardian)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Neutral Citation[2012] EWHC 865 (Fam)
Year2012
Date2012
CourtFamily Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 cases
  • Cumbria County Council v KW (1st Respondent) GM (2nd Respondent) LM and KR (child, Acting by their Children's Guardian) (3rd Respondent)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • 12 January 2016
    ...regularly see: GW and PW v Oldham MBC [2005] EWCA Civ 1247; Re U (A Child) [2005] 2 FLR 444; Islington LBC v Al-Alas and Rway [2012] 2 FLR 1239. These principles apply just as vigorously, in my judgement, to the fact finding process. A position of neutrality motivated solely by desire to ap......
  • Re A (A Child)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 16 November 2012
    ...they sought – and was told 'no'". 9 During the course of the June hearing the judge was taken to two recent decisions, London Borough of Islington v Al Alas and Wray [2012] EWHC 865 (Fam) and A County Council v M and F [2011] EWHC 1804 (Fam). The first of these cases, which I will refer to ......
  • TG (A Child)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 22 January 2013
    ...they compare to the alternative posited by the Local Authority? — the biomechanical evidence in London Borough of Islington v Al Alas [2012] EWHC 865 (Fam), Theis J at para 186 was that shaking is unlikely to result in the angular accelerations necessary to tear cranial blood vessels result......
  • Re Ad & Am (Fact-Finding hearing) (Application for re-hearing)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • 24 February 2016
    ...we cannot say" [68]. (Emphasis by underlining added) I further note that he gave evidence in Islington London Borough Council v Al Alas, Wray and Al Alas-Wray (Through Her Children's Guardian) [2012] EWHC 865 (Fam), though this was said to be of limited value in that case: "His evidence bot......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT