Islington London Borough Council v Ladele (Liberty Intervening)

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date2008
Neutral CitationUKEAT/453/08 ,[2008] UKEAT 0453_08_1912
Date2008
Year2008
CourtEmployment Appeal Tribunal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
184 cases
  • Johns v Derby City Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 28 February 2011
    ...law as enacted by Parliament. Well known examples include the recent decisions of the Court of Appeal in Islington London Borough Council v Ladele (Liberty intervening) [2009] EWCA Civ 1357, [2010] 1 WLR 955 (dismissing an appeal from the decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal: [2009]......
  • Mr I Tapping v Ministry of Defence: 1402660/2019 and 1400338/2020
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Tribunal
    • 8 November 2021
    ...does not suffice to justify an inference of unlawful discrimination to satisfy stage one (London Borough of Islington v Ladele [2009] IRLR 154). 247. The test within s. 136 encouraged me to ignore the Respondent’s explanation for any poor treatment until the second stage of the exercise. I ......
  • Mr R Kawiliza v Lifeways and Others: 2410508/2019
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Tribunal
    • 22 June 2021
    ...means of achieving a legitimate aim. 79. Ms Quigley referred the Tribunal to the authority of London Borough of Islington v Ladele [2009] IRLR 154, and in particular, the comments of the EAT at paragraph 40 concerning the process to be adopted by the Tribunal when considering a direct discr......
  • Miss N Undre v Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs: 2601166/2015
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Tribunal
    • 13 April 2018
    ...been treated less favourably than the relevant comparator. (Statements to this effect can be seen in Islington Borough Council v Ladele [2009] ICR 387 and Cordell v Foreign and Commonwealth Office [2012] ICR 280, where it was recognised that the use of comparators may be of evidential value......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Achieving social mobility
    • United Kingdom
    • International Journal of Discrimination and the Law No. 13-4, December 2013
    • 1 December 2013
    ...24(3): 491–521 (p.495).65. See , for example, Preddy v. Bull [2012] EWCA 83 (appeal to the Supreme Court pending);Islington LBC v. Ladele [2009] ICR 387 (EAT), [38] (Elias, J) affirmed [2010] 1 WLR 955(CA); McFarlane v. Relate Avon Limited [2010] IRLR 196 (EAT), [18] (Underhill, J ),upheld,......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT